ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,700 Are you busy
169,438 Re: Forum
162,751 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (sparkyinak), 66 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#115437 - 10/29/03 11:51 PM new work started out wrong  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,439
NY, USA
[Linked Image]

half inch gal straight thru fire alarm junction box

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

(#2 and #3) kindorf and inch and a half conduit on top of pull box

[Linked Image]

a close up of a 1900 box with missing ko, right against the wood wall

-richard


Tools for Electricians:

#115438 - 10/30/03 06:49 AM Re: new work started out wrong  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Anyone have a code article that shows the top picture is a violation?

Ugly yes but a violation, not to sure.

Even pictures 2 and 3 not sure of what code article would apply here.

Certainly we do not need 3' of work space around this J Box.

Is the box supporting the kindorf?

Then perhaps not using the box as designed may be used.

Don't get me wrong this is ugly work but is it violating the code other than the missing KO.?

What does the building inspector think of the cut off stud for the raceway passing by?


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#115439 - 10/30/03 08:23 AM Re: new work started out wrong  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
We have had pictures of pipes through troughs and boxes before.
It would never occur to me to do this.
First of all because it seems extremely unconventional, but it also seems to be a violation of the listing/labeling of the box.
After all, what is the purpose of a junction, or pull box?
Also, how would you determine box fill in deciding if the box is large enough to accomodate the pipe, in addition to the wires?
I know of no volume allowance associated with various pipe sizes.


#115440 - 10/30/03 07:25 PM Re: new work started out wrong  
richard  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 94
L.I. New York
well, it turns out that the red wires are cat 5, and the box is in the way of some things they want to change, but to rewire is so much of a night mare, that they have decided to work around it. Also, whatever they decide on doing will make it hard to have access to either box.


#115441 - 10/30/03 07:44 PM Re: new work started out wrong  
pwood  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 67
castella,calif usa
building inspector say,
if there is a stud within 24 " of the stud in the corner it is not a problem,otherwise add another stud sistered to the back side of the butchered one.


#115442 - 11/02/03 11:43 AM Re: new work started out wrong  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
The raceway through the box although not a usual installation is IMO permissible. I have not found it yet, but there is some language in the code about this very type of installation. Box fill is according to the actual space the pipe occupies.
Why does it always seem that our work winds up in one little corner of these big buildings [Linked Image]?

Pierre


Pierre Belarge


Member Spotlight
Potseal
Potseal
Saskatchewan
Posts: 219
Joined: February 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7775 MB (Peak: 0.9216 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-26 02:18:53 UTC