ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by Potseal. 04/23/17 07:18 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,496 Are you busy
169,161 Re: Forum
162,509 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 67 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#112822 - 10/03/01 09:42 PM Sign your Name?  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,439
NY, USA
[Linked Image]
Quote
In a nearly new Jaguar dealership, we discovered this while installing some new equipment. The contractor that did this not only forgot to pull the shipping label with his name on it off of the panel can, he put a big logo sticker on the panel cover with his name on it!

I guess he's proud ....

Scott (Electure)


Tools for Electricians:

#112823 - 10/04/01 10:38 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
Jim M  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 457
Chestertown, MD, USA
Besides the sloppy wire run it looks like the locknut is missing. Is this rigid or IMC? And why is the wire in front of the cover insert?


#112824 - 10/04/01 11:29 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
rhagfo  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 43
Portland, OR. USA
I am just a handy home owner, but to me it looks like the piece of rigid is too long to put a lock nut on the outside of the enclosure, and there is no bushing on the end to protect the wires from chafing.


#112825 - 10/05/01 06:38 AM Re: Sign your Name?  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,306
rhagfo;
i'm not pickin' on you here, but if it's bad enough to be caught by the untrained eye...it's bad!


#112826 - 10/05/01 07:50 AM Re: Sign your Name?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
The rigid nipple coming up from the bottom is a 2"X6". It passes completely through the KO, with about 1/2" inside the can before the threads even start! The horizontal nipple has locknuts only on the insides of the cans. There's not a bushing to be found anywhere I've been in the whole building.
The wires across the deadfront were just being held up so I could get a better pic of this glorious work (they were laying across the sharp edge of the nipple).
Any wiring above the T-bar ceiling is a breeze to trace, as there are no blank covers on any of the boxes. [Linked Image]
Yup, it's bad.


#112827 - 10/05/01 03:00 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
Merritt  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 21
Miami, Fl, USA
well, to say the least, i think i see a green wire comming out of the offending nipple.. my guess is the boxes are bonded together.. i hope...

-m


Remember when you read my posts, im only 17, still learning... "Hey, its takes what it takes!"

#112828 - 10/05/01 05:55 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
rhagfo,

Good call, I just wanted to add (for general public) that a locknut should be inside and outside the box too so that they could be tightened properly.

Bill


#112829 - 10/07/01 08:49 AM Re: Sign your Name?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
Another point we should probably bring up is that any conduit 1-1/4" or larger, &/or containing conductors #4 or larger is required to have a bushing on the end to protect the conductor from the sharp edge.

Also, a rigid conduit nipple as shown is required to have a bushing regardless of its trade size.


#112830 - 10/07/01 08:36 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
Nick  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
Riverside, CA
Electure,
I'm just being nit picky here. I have never seen any requirement saying conduits 1-1/4 or larger have to have bushings. Lots of sections refer us to 300-4(f). Conduits containing #4 conductors or larger. The way I see it a 3/4" conduit with 2 #4's requires a bushing. A 2" with 20 #10's does not. Please correct me if I am wrong but having heard the 1-1/4" or larger reference before, I think it is either part of an older code that is not valid anymore or one of those many untruths taken as code because thats how we were taught. [Linked Image]
I do agree with the rigid conduit reference.
Nick


#112831 - 10/07/01 10:34 PM Re: Sign your Name?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
I have talked trash. [Linked Image]
Nick's right. There was a 1-1/4" rule, but apparently it's gone even by '96.
Yes, it was from previous codes.



[This message has been edited by electure (edited 10-08-2001).]


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
waymag
waymag
dallas, texas, USA
Posts: 67
Joined: January 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8171 MB (Peak: 0.9902 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-24 01:42:08 UTC