ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Recent Posts
VFD MotorFeeders
by Yoopersup. 10/22/17 07:52 PM
Generator Cable Sizing
by brsele. 10/18/17 07:39 PM
What do you do?
by gfretwell. 10/17/17 01:08 AM
Good ol' copper pipe in the fuse holder trick
by HotLine1. 10/16/17 07:16 PM
Another generator question
by HotLine1. 10/16/17 07:02 PM
New in the Gallery:
Gallery Test
Popular Topics(Views)
241,452 Are you busy
177,435 Re: Forum
169,017 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 59 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#106303 - 05/02/05 10:01 PM Prove What's Wrong Here  
Admin  Online Content

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,458
NY, USA
Quote
This pic goes into the category of things you just know are wrong....but where is code violated?

What you see is a duplex receptacle mounted in a 3-0 box. It is attached where the box cover usually attaches. There are covers made for this box that hold a single receptacle, but not a duplex. An oversize receptacle coverplate will just about cover the front of the box.

- renosteinke
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#106304 - 05/03/05 12:23 AM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
sierra electrician  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 219
North Fork, CA USA
I just took a duplex just like that out of service today and it had a Raco Dup cover made of stamped steel.

Rob


#106305 - 05/03/05 12:38 AM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,708
Anaheim, CA. USA
I may have 1 or 2 scenarios to ponder as violations:

<OL TYPE=1>

[*] Is this Outlet Grounded (Box and Receptacle) - via an EGC?


[*] Is there adequate free Conductor length in this Box?
</OL>

And the most obvious: Why no cover? (hee hee [Linked Image] ...)

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

#106306 - 05/03/05 12:54 AM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
frenchelectrican  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 939
Wi/ Paris France { France for ...
John :


i did see cover for 3-0 and 4-0 verison have duplex verison but i dont like it not much becasue the older cover only have single screw to hold the repectaile in place the later cover have two screw or three screw to really lock the repetcale in place i know Raco do make it


Merci , Marc


Pas de problme,il marche n'est-ce pas?"(No problem, it works doesn't it?)


#106307 - 05/03/05 09:56 AM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
You learn something new every day....

I've never seen the duplex cover for the smaller (3-0) box...didn't know there was one. Maybe this is OK after all?

Sierra- sharp eye! You are correct, the old romex has no ground wire.
As for "free conductor" length, that I'm not so sure about; back then there was no such requirement. Conductors often had insulation skinned off them as they passed through the box, and a very short pigtail twisted and soldered in place, then wrapped with tape.


#106308 - 05/03/05 04:24 PM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Box should be a device box so that the device can be properly installed.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#106309 - 05/03/05 06:02 PM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Joe,
The manufacturers make covers for duplex recptacles in octgon boxes, so why would this be an improper installation? (assuming that the cover was actually installed)
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#106310 - 05/03/05 06:23 PM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Don:

I am aware of that cover, and I am commenting on this "incorrect" installation.

The receptacle on the round cover is secured to the octagon box using the two 8/32 screws that are used to secure the entire assembly.

The installation here is not correct under any circumstances!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#106311 - 05/03/05 06:37 PM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,262
Fullerton, CA USA
I've seen many of these that have the mounting ears/yoke cut off right at the recptacle. The receptacle is held to the cover with the single 6-32 in the center of the cover, while the cover itself is screwed to the box with the usual 8-32s.


#106312 - 05/03/05 07:03 PM Re: Prove What's Wrong Here  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
[Linked Image]

Here is that cover --- and the proper receptacle is made without a yoke (strap) and the single 6/32 screw is actually a violation since this would be a "cover mounted" receptacle.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8197 MB (Peak: 0.9968 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-10-23 02:27:15 UTC