ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by SteveFehr. 07/23/17 09:46 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,260 Are you busy
174,689 Re: Forum
167,090 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 65 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#105519 - 03/11/05 04:20 AM Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
CODE VIOLATIONS
What’s Wrong Here?

By Joe Tedesco, NEC Columnist

How well do you know the Code? Think you can spot violations the original installer either ignored or couldn’t identify himself? Here’s your chance to moonlight as an electrical inspector and second-guess someone else’s work from the safety of your living room or office. Joe Tedesco, who has a knack for finding shoddy electrical work, did the dirty work and found this mess. Now it’s your turn to identify the violation.

[Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#105520 - 03/11/05 09:16 AM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
BOSSMAN  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
BEMIDJI, MN,USA
Well the pipe should be reemed and then we need a fitting with some type of bushing.And with the looks of the conduit it might be a little tight for both of them.


#105521 - 03/11/05 03:48 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,853
Brick, NJ USA
Joe:
A one word "What's wrong" would be EVERYTHING!
Conduit not reamed
No connector or threads/locknuts/bushing.
Excessive cable jacket within the "enclosure"
Cable installed in conduit?? (No from-to)
NO bonding of the conduit.
The 'remains' of the hole, hanging in the enclosure.
And there must be a lot more that is out of the range of your lens.
BTW, what ssize is the 'enclosure?? ..

John


John

#105522 - 03/13/05 11:07 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
What code violation is "excessive cable jacket" inside the enclosure?
300.10
300.15
There is a possible pipe fill violation.

Pierre


Pierre Belarge

#105523 - 03/15/05 07:18 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Please continue .....

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#105524 - 03/16/05 11:07 AM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
BOSSMAN  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 28
BEMIDJI, MN,USA
Well there is definity some problems here.
1.Subpanel grounds and neutrals comebined.
2.Extra set of wires in the lugs with feeders going somewere without over current protection.
3.White wire on breaker.
4.Freeder Neutral not reidentified as white.
5.Loose connection on lugs panel buned up needs replacement.
6.I hope they derated all them wires in that conduit.


#105525 - 03/16/05 08:41 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
gideonr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 161
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Insulation overstripped on a couple of wires?

Can't see it too well but what's going on in the top left corner with the knock-out possibly left open and no grommit?


#105526 - 03/24/05 02:42 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
RSmike  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 134
Holland, MI USA
What the heck is this panel? Federal nonsPacific???

I'm just a youngin'
I've only ever seen Square D, CH, ITE, GE, Siemens.... this is new to me....or old...as the case may be.

RSlater,
RSMike


#105527 - 03/24/05 03:28 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
mxslick  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 803
Atomic City, ID USA
RSmike:

That lovely panel is our old friend, Zinsco. Popular here in So Calif. along with FPE and Pushmatic. [Linked Image]


Stupid should be painful.

#105528 - 03/25/05 06:23 PM Re: Now it’s your turn to identify the violation!  
tshea  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
racine, wi
I'm guessing this is actually a main service panel with NO MAIN breaker.
Zinsco or Sylvania.
I looked again. It is a main service panel.
The top 2 lugs are for the service entrance, while the 2p70 is the "lighting main" for the lower half of the panel. The top 2 pole breaker is "legal" but the 1/2 breakers in the center are not.

[This message has been edited by tshea (edited 03-25-2005).]


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,260
Joined: December 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8184 MB (Peak: 0.9962 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-24 00:52:58 UTC