O.K., I drove out past this installation again this morning and stopped to examine things more closely. This is purely reasoning (and a little guesswork) on my part, so I could be wrong! If you think my logic is flawed, then feel free to criticize.
Here's a map showing the location of the site:
I've added some markings to the first photo to make the description easier to follow.
The house you can see in the background and the trees and bushes either side of it are along the main highway. Just to the left of the photo is the little back lane,
The red arrow marks the path of the underground cables you can see in pics #5 and #9, which run back under the lane.
As you should be able to make out in the photo, there are HV lines from pole C to the lower set of insulators on pole E. These are connected via air-break switches to the upper lines on the pole. From the upper set of insulators are lines running to pole D. Thus the lines on poles C, D, and E are all connected together.
There is a triad of red HV cables running down pole D (by way of some more switches) and disappearing into the ground. No other underground connections run on poles C or E (except for a ground lead for the LV side of the pole-mount xfmr).
The lines disappearing to the right from pole E run in the direction of Barton Turf village. As you can see on the map, B/Turf is on a kind of dead-end loop road.
I've not traced the lines all the way, but I'm assuming that these terminate in B/Turf, as there would be nowhere else for them to go with just the Broads (waterways) and marshland beyond. I think therefore, it's reasonable to assume that power is being fed off to the right from pole E.
The new pole A has been labeled "Village," and this is clearly on the load side of the new sectionalizer. It seems reasonable that the cables disappearing into the ground from pole A take the output from the sectionalizer and feed it to pole D, from which it then feeds down to B/Turf village.
As C, D, and E are all linked together, power must also, therefore, being fed off to the left from pole C.
Again, I haven't been able to trace the latter lines, but they run across the fields almost parallel to the main highway, so probably just feed to odd buildings on the highway and the couple of houses and farms on the next little backlane.
If all the above is true, we've accounted for all HV lines except those underground ones. That means, therefore, that these must be the incoming feed to this site. and logically must connect to the new sectionalizer via pole B.
Where this 11kV feed comes from I have no idea, but there are 33kV transmission lines running roughly northwest from Stalham in the general direction of Worstead. There's probably a 33-to-11kV substation somewhere in the vicinity, although I've never come across it. The new pole B is labeled "Pig Unit," so maybe its somewhere next to the farm. Or does "Pig" refer to something else?
Anyway, as I figure it, power is coming in underground, and going up pole B to the new sectionalizer. From pole A it's connected via underground cxbles to pole D, via air-break switches, on to pole E. The lines from E feed down to B/Turf village, and the link via more air switches to pole C then feeds the other odd buildings back along the main road.
The LV lines from the xfmr provide 3-phase power to the farm off to the left, and two phases are run back a couple of hundred yards to the houses near the main highway.
There are a few unanswered questions in my mind though.
For a start, on the back of pole E is an abandoned cable, hacked off where it emerges from the protective cover and looking as though it's been that way for a good few years. Was this the original feed to the pole?
If you look at the manual switchgear (pic #2) which has just been removed, the sets of cables look relatively new. So did the underground feed originally go straight to pole E, then at some point the switchgear was installed to be able to isolate the Barton Turf feed?
If so though, why was the original cable abandoned?
Why is pole D there anyway? All it does is provide a transition from pole E to the underground feeder. Why didn't they just run the feeder straight up pole E, as was obviously the case at some point in the past?
One further point I noticed today was that the ground from the side of the enclosure round to pole D looks as though it's been dug recently. In fact it's indistinguishable from the newly filled trench from the enclosure to new poles A and B. Maybe they dug this trench, laid a new cable and filled it in without me noticing.
If my logic of the arraangement is correct though, pole D is fed from the load-side of the sectionalizer on pole A. Looking at the pic where the cables were run down the new poles and waiting to be connected, it doesn't look as though there's enough there to have reached all the way round to and up pole D. If you were going to run a new cable up pole D, you run a single length back to pole A, surely? Or if you were going to just splice into the old cables under where the manual switchgear was, why has the ground back to pole D been disturbed?
Ah well.... Just one of those little mysteries, I suppose!
BTW, that brand of Sectionaliser is called a Roto-Sect.
Mike,
The name on the unit is "Whipp & Bourne." Does that mean anything to you?
{ Edited for minor typos }
[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 06-30-2005).]