ECN Forum
Posted By: drkana wire size - 11/04/07 03:14 PM
what size wire in paralell is equal to 300 mcm and is there a reference table somwhere?
Posted By: Roger Re: wire size - 11/04/07 04:57 PM
See Table 8 in Chapter 9

Roger
Posted By: drkana Re: wire size - 11/05/07 02:29 AM
looking at that table it looks like 3/0 or 2/0 but i'm not sure any suggestions.
Posted By: resqcapt19 Re: wire size - 11/06/07 02:22 AM
What are you trying to do?
Don
Posted By: Roger Re: wire size - 11/06/07 11:22 AM
2/0 won't make it but, I think Don's question needs to be answered, it may save you some grief.

Roger
Posted By: SteveFehr Re: wire size - 11/07/07 12:30 PM
With alternating current, magnetic fields build up inside the cable and skin resistance comes into play, so cable ampacity doesn't scale linearly with cross-section. In addition, cooling is related to the surface area of the cable, and larger cables have less surface area than two smaller ones to dissipate heat. Ergo, you can safely (and legally) carry more current through 2x 150MCM than through 1x 300MCM, and 2x 1/0 may be sufficient depending on what you intend.

If you're talking DC, reference Chapter 9, Table 8. If you're talking 60Hz AC, reference a combination of 310.60 with the derating rules of 310.1(B)(2)(a)... and the myraid of other codes that may apply.
Posted By: earlydean Re: wire size - 11/19/07 07:50 PM
Table 310.16 takes all of this into consideration. Assuming THWN insulated copper conductors, 300 kcmil has an ampacity of 285 amps, therefore 2 paralleled 1/0 AWG conductors in separate conduit or cable would have equivalent current carrying capacity. It is necessary to keep these paralleled conductors in separate conduit or cables because of the heat buildup when more than 3 current carrying conductors are installed in one conduit (300.15(B)(2)(a))
© ECN Electrical Forums