ECN Forum
Posted By: Admin Is this a Violation? - 06/04/02 02:00 AM
[Linked Image]
Quote
This photo was taken in an industrial plant. The plant uses a lot of, pre-assembled, multi-conductor, flexible cables with MTW outer jacket insulation. These cables are usually run in cable tray. Each end of the cable has a male or female screw-on connector. There is a 15hp, 3 ph, 480 volt motor fed from the starter with one of these 50 foot, 6-pin cables. The connector at the motor disconnect failed. To get machine working, for production reasons, the bad connector/plug had to be cut off and it was discovered inside the cable a green #4 wire was used as one of the 480v power conductors and a red #4 wire was the ground (after some fuses were blown). The other two #4 power conductors were black and yellow. There were also two #14 wires for 120v pwr to unit. Even though these pwr conductors were internal to the cable and usually never accessed.… Is this a code violation?! Any comments would be appreciated.

Thank you all.

-MikeW
Posted By: MikeW Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/04/02 08:45 PM
I’m not getting any responses so far. Hope I explained situation clearly. This motor disconnect was wired with, what I call, a male connector or receptacle. The color coding on the wires (pig-tail) from this male receptacle into disconnect were o.k.. I think the power conductors were all black and the ground was green. So when you plugged the female end of the 50 ft. cable into disconnect’s male receptacle, wiring to the observer appeared to be code compliant. No one ever knew that internally the cable had a green wire caring 480v and a red conductor was a ground. And we would never of known had we not been forced, by circumstances, to cut off the cable’s female end and wire it directly to motor disconnect.

Is the manufacturer of this cable suppose to follow the NEC?

We tried to pull the end connector off the new cable we received, to replace the one pictured above, but couldn’t without damaging or destroying new cable. So how do you check the wiring?

We were told the cable manufacturer was notified of what we found.
Posted By: sparky Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/04/02 10:12 PM
Hi Mike;
there are obviously violations here, green is not to be used as a ungrounded or 'hot' conductor....nor ir red to be used for a grounding conductor....nor are the 3 whites i see on the load side to be hots....cardboard is not a kosher connector....if there are line taps, they must meet code....


this is a mess!
Posted By: NJwirenut Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/05/02 02:26 AM
Off the top of my head:

No connectors/bushings?

Hot green wire on feed?

Hot white wires on load side?

EGCs terminated to operating mechanism?

Improper tap on line side?
Posted By: joeh20 Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/05/02 08:00 AM
Was not done in a neat nor workmanlike manner.
I was told once it was a violation to know the code and to intently not use it, And a violation to not know it and perform work within it scope.
I don't know that either of these are referenced in the document proper, but still fine rules to live by and work by.
When I first started to work and older gentleman would have me do and redo my conduit until it suited him, some was a little rough I admit, but I was learning then. He told me that you don't learn to good work by installing poor work, even if it would pass the code or inspector. So I would bend and rebend conduit until they fit just so. He told me a quality conduit installation will hardly ever be noticed, but a poor or unsightly installation will be seen by everyone.
Posted By: Redsy Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/05/02 11:14 AM
The white conductors on the load side terminals is a violation of Article 200.7
The green conductor on the line side violates Art. 400.23 and 310.12(B)&(C)
The red conductor as EGC violates Art. 250.119 and the manner in which it is attached violates 250.148.
The lack of a fitting on the cable violates Art. 400.14
I don't have any more time right now, maybe there's more.

[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 06-05-2002).]
Posted By: Lance1990 Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/05/02 08:07 PM
Do you have a picture from a greater distance away. Is that mounted right on the motor where in place of the pecker head? I don't know why they color code the inside of a cable assembly at all. If it were all black, at least you guys would have paid closer attention to pin connections. I hate all the pre-fab cable assemblies nowadays. Including re-lock. I find myself not thinking about the circuitry as much, and just plugging stuff in. I also wish the NEC said you couldn't coil up excess in the trays also, and had to reterminate to length. Thanks for the heads-up on not trusting inside colors of cables. Somebody please phase tape the wires, or change pigtail at feed origin, and put a ground lug(s) in.
Posted By: Redsy Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/06/02 10:50 AM
Good eye, Lance. It does look like the motor leads connected to the switch.
Posted By: Bjarney Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/06/02 04:15 PM
Finally, someone got the requirements for an isolated ground right the first time.
Posted By: HIGHVOLTAGE Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/07/02 03:37 AM
Hmmm cute ,,, how about
done by someone not having an Elec Lic and most definitely without a permit or an inspection
Posted By: Admin Re: Is this a Violation? - 06/08/02 05:55 AM
[Linked Image]
Quote
Lance & Redsy, yes the disconnect is mounted directly to motor. The white leads on the load side of disconnect are directly out of the motor.

You can also see the new cable assembly that will be used as soon as we receive the male receptacle and pigtail to be wired to disconnect box.

Lance what you say about color coding makes sense. Why not use all black conductors? I’m thinking these cable assemblies are made by non-electricians. Maybe the colors help them keep things straight. Like I hooked pin #1 to yellow wire on female end so I have to hook pin #1 to yellow wire on male end. I’m thinking that way they wouldn’t have to ring out the wires during assembly. Little thinking and skill required. I am getting way off track!

Lance, yes we also, often, have to use a 200 foot cable assembly where a 50 footer would be adequate; and we serpentine the excess length in the cable trays. Makes it hard to remove cables later with all the tangled extra cable in tray. Also hard to trouble shoot……when a cable needs to be traced through the tray!

HIGHVOLTAGE, your quote: “Hmmm cute ,,, how about done by someone not having an Elec Lic and most definitely without a permit or an inspection.”

You are right! Most of the electricians in this factory are unlicensed (they did complete an apprenticeship) and in my 20 years working here I have never ever seen an inspector!

Thanks guys for the responses. It is fun and educational.

-MikeW
Posted By: John Steinke Re: Is this a Violation? - 09/13/02 03:02 AM
It's time to check your assumptions. Exactly what is the cable intended for? Is it UL/CSA listed? Or, was it "imported" from the mines, where MHSA rules apply? Was it scavenged from some other non-electrical application (such as aerospace, rail, etc.)?
Otherwise, regardless of the source, wires that can be seen need to be marked in accordance with the NEC. The code discussed only four colors (white, green, orange, and grey), and these guys violated three of them.
Posted By: Trumpy Re: Is this a Violation? - 09/13/02 08:26 AM
Whatever happened to fitting a simple
plastic bushing, where a cable enters a
box.
Believe me, this makes all the difference,
especially when you get a face full of
molten copper,when you move the wires
Posted By: BryElect Re: Is this a Violation? - 10/21/02 04:00 AM
It looks to me that the cable was made for use with a Synchros AC motor or a Repulsion motor. Not for a standerd 3ph. The two smaller conductors would be used for the DC excitation.. Blue and Orange...Just trying to help on ID..
© ECN Electrical Forums