ECN Forum
Posted By: Ryan_J Trusses - 10/22/03 11:58 PM
What are we allowed to do to a truss, as far as drilling, cutting, notching, altering, etc...

[Linked Image]
Posted By: ga.sparky56 Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 01:46 AM
Ryan, I looked at some of the paperwork that came with some roof trusses the other day. It basically said no drilling, notching,notching,chopping or hacking.

If you must do one of the above,it says to consult a structural engineer.

Russell
Posted By: Big Jim Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 04:41 AM
Pretty much, any alteration to an engineered truss requires approval of the manufacturer or a competent authority (licensed professional engineer). No holes, notches, cut, etc. without written permission. Engineered beams - LVL and the like - are the same story. They usually come with installation instructions showing allowable holes.
Posted By: iwire Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 09:06 AM
I agree with the others.

Nothing is to be done to modify the truss in any way without an engineer signing off on it.

Once an engineer is involved you can do what ever he/she designs and signs for.

I mostly work with steel truss and we are not allowed to support off of the bottom cord on most jobs, this includes I beams too.

On these jobs the ceiling contractor must tie off to the top chord of the truss.

And if I ever took a sawzal to a steel truss the GC would have me paying for repair replacement. [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 10-23-2003).]
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 08:38 PM
In most single family homes I've worked in they've had 2 x 6 (or better) joists for the ceiling/attic floor @ 16" on center.

It's common for the Attic to be used for storage around here too. What kind of an Attic storage load would these Trusses support? Is that figured in the design of these things?

Bill
Posted By: pwood Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 08:42 PM
all excellent answers [Linked Image].it is amazing what forms of truss butchery an inspector sees during framing inspections.one person had to remove the roof and start over.they were not happy campers. [Linked Image]sometimes the engineers cannot design a fix as was the case.think before you butcher!
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: Trusses - 10/23/03 08:59 PM
Ryan,

Slightly off-topic, but here's some past discussion on Engineered Beams:
https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000607.html
https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000864.html

Bill
Posted By: Pinemarten Re: Trusses - 10/25/03 01:42 AM
I don't remember drilling holes in trusses.

It was never allowed.

Joists were a different story.
One carpenter I talked to, said joist manufacturers had guidelines.
It was a simple math thing. Size of hole, number and spacing of holes, width of joist, distance of holes from center or end, span of joist.........etc.

It sounds confusing, but the math is like sizing conductors for pipe fill.

When we rarely had to go through a truss, we told the carpenter the situation, and he either 'boxed' out a section or showed us a better route.

Joists are one story, but I feel one should never, ever, drill a truss!
Posted By: PCBelarge Re: Trusses - 10/25/03 04:00 AM
Unless designed otherwise, the truss frame construction supporting the floor of an attic are not designed to carry much of a load. I do not have my book here, but I will try to read it at work and let you know.


When running wire in an unfinished attic, lets not forget about 320.23, especially since drilling is not an option!
Pierre

[This message has been edited by PCBelarge (edited 10-25-2003).]
Posted By: ga.sparky56 Re: Trusses - 10/25/03 04:22 AM
Pierre,since you brought up 320.23,I am always scrambling to comply with this one.
A lot of times the framers will put an attic acess in after I'm long gone. And it always seems to wind up where I presume to be the least likely place,and of course right next to several wire runs that would have been way out of the way otherwise.


Russell
Posted By: DougW Re: Trusses - 01/09/04 01:34 AM
As a firefighter, I've grown to really despise lightweight construction methods. Remember - most of these methods are used to save $$ - and if the book says they can be placed 48"o.c. max, you can bet they will be.

This, of course is very different than the fudge factor allowed by the "old" 2x10 16"o.c. When lightweight fails, it fails BIG.

They're even telling us FF's to not go into lightweight buildings if they've been exposed to fire conditions due to the rapid failure of these things.

I won't cut trusses. We've even been warned about cutting them when venting roofs causing failures.

I hate lightweight.
© ECN Electrical Forums