You can tell it was made for the Niagra Falls area. Who else produced 25 hertz power?

Jezzz that is big sucker there i am sure that weight in pretty good in iron wise i dont recall to see the 25 HZ ballast for quite a while

Merci , Marc

There were lots of places with 25Hz power. But driving a fluorescent at that frequency? Ouch! Gives me a headache just to imagine it!

Didn't the Pensylvania (spelling?) Railroad use 11000VAC 25Hz for powering those big GG-1 electric locomotives? There was a steel mill that also used 25 Hz supply for the equipment (the name Bethlehem rings a bell-on the eastern side of the U.S.)

Sir Adam Beck in Niagara Falls still has 25 cycle generators. They have several industrial customers on both sides of the border that use it. I think they are trying to phase it out by not renewing the contracts as they expire.

Here's a great article, titled "The Frequency Changer Era", that discusses 25-cycle power:
http://services3.ieee.org/organizations/pes/public/2003/sep/peshistory.html

If you do a search on frequency, 25Hz etc. you'll find several threads where we've discussed the use of 25Hz in the past, and the fact that a few places in the U.S. once used 50Hz (e.g. Los Angeles area up until the 1930s).

One other thing I note about that ballast is the nominal voltage rating: 118V instead of the more usual 117V.

I allways thought that in lighting any frequency bellow 50Hz a flicker was noticable by the human eye?

The Canadian volts are not quite as large as the US, so it takes more of them.

I offer an even worse thing... (rare) Austrian railway stuff: fluorescents run directly off 16.7 Hz... Now THAT flickers awfully!

Just thinking about that gives me a migraine... I can notice computer monitors and LEDs around 70Hz... 16Hz would probably look like a rave to me.

Ah, like U.S. pints vs. Imperial pints!

On the frequency issue, my mother always used to say that she could notice the flickering sometimes on fluorescents, even on our normal 50Hz supplies.

The 25Hz is still big in the steel industry I am told because it has less zero crossovers. Supposedly that is better for melting steel.

Aren't arc furnaces DC?

Wasn't the choice of 25Hz made for the use in slow speed motors that are used in the rollers & conveyers?

Ya as far as I know 25Hz is still used in at least 2 of the major steel mills here in "Steeltown", and yes its for slow speed motor applications only..

On another note I just finished cleaning out my boss' storage barn and found a pile of old fixtures with similar ballasts inside, only difference was there was a screw to set frequency instead of that "plug" like the ballast I posted had.. Also in the pile of spare parts I came across an old oil burner and attached to the housing was a metal tag that said " This unit has been converted for 60 Hz operation".. Can tell that thing was around from the days of 25Hz power originally!

A.D

I don't work in a steel plant. That is just what someone told me.

most arc furnaces are AC ..and are used by the "mini-mills" rather than the large mills who still make steel using blast and basic oxygen furnaces

iron from the blast furnace is converted to steel by pumping huge quantities of oxygen into the molten iron
which coincidentally release large quanities of carbon monoxide....which is why we have to wear CO monitors when playing around most things in the BOF or above the blast furnace

I do recall seeing 25 Hz stuff but all the newer equipment uses VFDs or DC drives

I'm kinda surprised that this ballast is still alive.

But the older stuff was almost always built to last anyways (It's called conservative design, folks. )

But there is one major safety flaw that no one's mentioned yet...lack of thermal protection built in. (Not "P" rated.)

There are not too many smells as rank and putrid as a burning ballast. Think stinky tennis shoes, mouldy fish and hot tar and it'll be close.

And in a few cases such ballasts have caused serious fires.

I have seen a few "P" rated ballasts still get hot enough to expel the tar-like potting compound inside, though.

Don't those old ballasts have PCB's in them?

Yes, IIRC the capacitors used in them had PCB-laced fluid in them. I'm not too sure how many of those capacitors actually failed, the few ballasts I disected after a flamout showed signs of shorting/overheating of the coils.

Modern ballasts are usually marked "Non-PCB's" or something along the lines...

Modern isn't always better it seems...I have two "shoplights" (dual 40watt 4 foot lamps) in my garage, and the electronic ballasts gave off a very strong odor of hot electronics for thier first few hours of operation. I don't leave them on unattended.