ECN Forum
Posted By: trollog they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 03:02 PM
anyone come across one of these in the course of their service work, or demoing old industrial work?

http://www.floobydust.com/turbo-encabulator/ge_turbo-encabulator.pdf


a little more history on this device can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turboencabulator
Posted By: renosteinke Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 03:34 PM
Thx for the second link. I looked at the first, and I think I would have understood it better, had it been written in Chinese, Farsi, or Swahili.

I was completely lost in the language, and didn't understand a word [Linked Image]
I just bumped it up in the Theory & Discussion area from when Sandsnow shared it with us last Feb. A video is just so much better for understanding high brow theory of this type.
Joe https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/Forum7/HTML/000469.html

[This message has been edited by JoeTestingEngr (edited 01-20-2007).]
Posted By: sandsnow Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 04:32 PM
I had no idea just how old this joke was

Thanks for the link to the history
Posted By: hbiss Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 05:44 PM
Went to the first link and after reading parts of that spec sheet I knew it had to be a joke.

Apparently somebody has too much time on their hands. That document really does look real.

-Hal
Posted By: sandsnow Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 06:36 PM
do a search for turboencabulator. A bunch of stuff out there.

Here's one:

Legend has it that GE engineers were frustrated by product managers
signing off on products they had no business reviewing - mainly because
they had no technical background whatsoever.

According to the story, the Turboencabulator was submitted to the GE
product management team and signed off as a product!

I know a GE engineer who may have been around close to that time, I will have to ask him.
Posted By: NJwirenut Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/20/07 11:21 PM
Fake datasheets have a long history in the engineering field--here's one for a "WOM", or Write Only Memory:
http://academics.vmi.edu/ee_js/Research/IC_Datasheets/digital_cmos/Write%20Only%20Memory.pdf

I love the plot of socket insertions vs. number of pins remaining... [Linked Image]
http://www.rane.com/pi14.html

Here's the nifty gadget we were thinking of buying when I worked at Ch. 61 in Cleveland.

I think many of these things would come out in early April. Go figure.
Joe
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5125780462773187994&q=retroencabulator

Retroencabulator! It's got a new lunar wane shaft!
Posted By: trollog Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 03:41 AM
when I said they don't make em like they used to, I mean hoaxes like that one [Linked Image]
Posted By: hbiss Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 05:07 AM
Rane Pseudoacoustic Infector...

Rane- if you use any of their products you quickly see that those guys have a great sense of humor. Nobody else makes reading their product manuals (for their real products) and application notes actually fun. So it's no surprise that they dreamed something like that up as an April fools joke.

-Hal
Posted By: pauluk Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 01:52 PM
Wonderful stuff! [Linked Image]

I remember a similar fake data sheet for the "WOM" back in the late 1970s. It didn't have the graph of "pins remaining" vs. "number of insertiions" though -- Great idea!
Posted By: chi spark Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 02:29 PM
Yes, but does it have LRF support?

(little rubber feet)
Posted By: Admin Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 06:42 PM
Quote
Here is a datasheet released in 1950 by Eitel-McCullough (Eimac), a manufacturer of radio transmitting tubes. They released a similar one for a tube called a "1Z2Z", but I can't find that one at the moment.

NJwirenut
[Linked Image]
Posted By: Dnkldorf Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 07:41 PM
Any idea what the hydrogen deficiency rating of that 606 is?

[This message has been edited by Dnkldorf (edited 01-21-2007).]
Posted By: NJwirenut Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/21/07 07:49 PM
Having a double-sucked vacuum, probably pretty deficient.. [Linked Image]
Posted By: pauluk Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/22/07 01:00 AM
Quote
They released a similar one for a tube called a "1Z2Z"

[Linked Image]
Posted By: jdevlin Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/22/07 01:10 AM
That one looks like it might be use in electric toilet.
It looks like it has built in plunger. It has urinated tungsten filament. I hold 8.8 gallons. To prevent splattery signals a large leak is recommended
Posted By: Peter Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/22/07 01:52 AM
Taking 19.2" as the standard cubit, this thing would be
20.6592" long and
12.3456" Diameter.
I haven't checked the gallons.
~Peter
Posted By: NJwirenut Re: they dont make em like they used to - 01/22/07 02:23 AM
That would make the "606" even bigger than the 2000T, a REAL Eimac tube of the period...
http://frank.yueksel.org/tubes/sheets/088/2/2000T.pdf
© ECN Electrical Forums