ECN Forum
Electrical Engineer here. I have had this discussion at work and am trying to wrap my head around it.

Design and build custom machinery for sale in North America. Use the NEC as a basic guideline for sizing conductors and overcurrent protection. Using fine stranded large gauge conductors for power distribution to certain loads. High stand count cable is desired for flexibility during installation and service. Standard crimp lugs are not UL listed for high strand count conductors. Have been using them in this application for years with no history of problems.

Question is: Where does the NEC _REQUIREMENTS_ stop? I say the NEC stops at the system disconnect. Everything past that is the machinery manufacturer's decision.

Another example: RG 175 is UL listed for 35 V. We routinely run 800-1000 VDC thru it for X-Ray detectors. Catalog lists it for use up to 1000V. Are we violating the NEC?

Thanks
From a practical sense, do you need a permit to install this? Is it cord and plug connected?
If it were Europe the manufactured equipment would be covered by a whole range of technical standards, covering safety, emc, ergonomics, etc and would be certified by its maker against these, with no reference to building standards other than the required supply.
I would be surprised if it was much different on your side of the water. Certainly USA manufactured gear imported to UK has worked like this.
LarryC:

IMHO, the inspection process on MCCs (Control Cabinets) "stops" at the feeder.

"Equipment" that is remote from the MCC requires NEC conformance as to the wiring methods and OCP.

The 'interior' of the MCC is the responsibility of the mfg. and MUST have listing/label from a NRTL.

I assume your equipment has a NRTL listing/label, so if they are OK with the crimp terminations and FS conductors, that would be OK with me.

Larry, if the equipment is maunfactured in "an engineered controlled environment", then the NEC does not apply. The NEC is for new construction. All electrical equipment must be listed OR approved. Listing is not required for custom built equipment however the customer may require it if local ordinance does not. In your case, NEC 409, 725, and NFPA 79? may be applicable. Others may apply as well
Once all of the building permits are closed you will be dealing with the Fire/Life Safety officer and YMMV about how closely they are looking at installed equipment. I agree with John, having a NRTL sticker on it will pretty much make further inspection go away unless there is a fire. Repairing and modifying a listed box may have some legal ramifications but I have not seen it in real life. The lawyers told us we could not legally change a plug cap on a line cord (listing issues) but we still had a part number and we could order them.
Lawyers..... humph!
All,

The type of equipment I am talking about is large capital equipment. It may have multiple power sources, it may be in several rooms, it may be outside. It may be for medical use, facility security, or factory automated manufacturing. I am just trying to understand where one set of requirements stop and the next set begin.

I'm looking for the equivalent of the demarcation point that separates the phone company equipment from the building's equipment.

Quote
If the equipment is manufactured in "an engineered controlled environment", then the NEC does not apply.


I interpret that to mean, If we design and build it, and then oversee the installation of it in your facility, the NEC applies up to the Main disconnect(s) and everything past that falls on the machine designer/builder.

If there are multiple equipment cabinets connected to sub assemblies and each other, by cables laying in dedicated cable trays, are the cables subject to NEC requirements too? The power flowing thru the cable tray cables come from power supplies that are downstream of the disconnects.

Thanks for all of the replies so far.
This will get back to what the fire/life safety officer wants to see. Some may want to see a NRTL certification on large fixed in place equipment.

BTW since you mentioned phone equipment, remember they get a break on 90.2(B)(4)
Quote
(4) Installations of communications equipment under the exclusive control of communications utilities located outdoors or in building spaces used exclusively for such installations
Larry:
The second part of your reply basically falls into the following scenario:

Cabling from one piece of equipment to other equipment of the same system, in trays, would require 'listed' trays, bonding, and cabling. The methods and materials used to terminate cabling may have a 'look' by an inspector. IF the cabling is 'plug & play' type, I would just give it a glance, as it would be out of the NEC boundries.

Please note that the opinions herein are my personal opinions, based on guidelines within the NJ UCC, and may be different in other jurisdictions.

A 'short' wording of the regs is 'process equipment stops at the disconnects of the feeder at the equipment, and the fees imposed are only for the feeder and disconnect if it is NOT within the equipment. However ALL 'parts' of said system that are hard wired (NEC) are required to be within the permit app, and appropriate fees and inspections are required. (My words and not a direct quote)

Determination within my jurisdiction is part of the plan review, release, and permit issuing process.

Quote

Please note that the opinions herein are my personal opinions, based on guidelines within the NJ UCC, and may be different in other jurisdictions.



Quote
Cabling from one piece of equipment to other equipment of the same system, in trays, would require 'listed' trays, bonding, and cabling.


So if it low voltage data cables, it stills needs to be cable tray cable?

Thanks
Data and class 2 gets a big break there. You really just need to keep them neat but your IT guy will have grounding requirements that may exceed art 250.
http://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Belden-WP-Taking-the-Mystery-Out-of-600V-Ethernet-Applications.pdf

Quote
Regulations: NFPA 79 vs. NEC

Virtually all systems employed in manufacturing plants or industrial facilities are subject to the provisions of the NEC, unless they fall under the specific scope of the NFPA 79, the Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery.

The scope of NFPA 79 is defined as: “The provisions of this standard shall apply to the electrical/electronic equipment, apparatus, or systems of industrial machines operating from a nominal voltage of 600 Volts or less, and commencing at the point of connection of the supply circuit conductors to the electrical equipment of the machine.”

Further, under Section 1.5 of NFPA 79, Specific provisions not made in relation to NEC “On any point for which specific provisions are not made in this standard, the provisions of NFPA 70 shall be observed.”

Additionally, per Section 1.4, Specific provisions other than 79 “…the wiring between component machines of and industrial manufacturing system shall be covered by NFPA 70” with the “Exception: that wiring of component machines of an industrial manufacturing system that is supplied by the manufacturer as an integral part of the system is adequately protected and supported and meets the requirements of this standard.”

Given the above, one would conclude that any field wiring installed and terminated at the manufacturing site – unless done so by the OEM operating under NFPA 79 – would be subject to the provisions and requirements of the NEC, and only field wiring wholly inside the manufacturer supplied electrical or electronic equipment would be subject to NFPA 79
Information from Belden.

Regulations: NFPA 79 vs. NEC

Virtually all systems employed in manufacturing plants or industrial facilities are subject to the provisions of the NEC, unless they fall under the specific scope of the NFPA 79, the Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery.

The scope of NFPA 79 is defined as: “The provisions of this standard shall apply to the electrical/electronic equipment, apparatus, or systems of industrial machines operating from a nominal voltage of 600 Volts or less, and commencing at the point of connection of the supply circuit conductors to the electrical equipment of the machine.” Further, under Section 1.5 of NFPA 79, Specific provisions not made in relation to NEC “On any point for which specific provisions are not made in this standard, the provisions of NFPA 70 shall be observed.” Additionally, per Section 1.4, Specific provisions other than 79 “…the wiring between component machines of and industrial manufacturing system shall be covered by NFPA 70” with the “Exception: that wiring of component machines of an industrial manufacturing system that is supplied by the manufacturer as an integral part of the system is adequately protected and supported and meets the requirements of this standard.”

Given the above, one would conclude that any field wiring installed and terminated at the manufacturing site – unless done so by the OEM operating under NFPA 79 – would be subject to the provisions and requirements of the NEC, and only field wiring wholly inside the manufacturer supplied electrical or electronic equipment would be subject to NFPA 79.
Larry:

"So if it low voltage data cables, it stills needs to be cable tray cable?"

800.100 (H) specs a bunch of comm that is OK in tray. IMHO, there is no 'short' answer. With todays cabling being 'a cable of many uses' you should find CT rated/labeled comm with little or no problems. You may consider a 'multi-use' data cable as your "go to".

As Greg said, keep it neat,! Some inspectors will be 'happy' if it's neat and may not look further.


Thanks for the replies. I dug even further and yes it does get more complicated.

The last two blank posts are where I tried to copy and paste a section of a white paper from Belden cable, about their 600V TC Ethernet cable. It has a 4 paragraph section about where NFPA 79 and 70 apply.

Why it did not post, I do not understand. It looked good in the preview page.

I will bring this up at work tomorrow and we will see what happens.

Larry
© ECN Electrical Forums