ECN Forum
Posted By: Trumpy AM Radio? - 01/30/03 04:56 AM
How much is AM radio used in the US these days?.
Has it lost it's appeal to FM radio?, just being a poor cousin, because of static and other Electro-magnetic Interference?.
Please put your 2 cents worth in-
Posted By: Wirenuttt Re: AM Radio? - 01/30/03 05:01 AM
FMs for music, AMs for talk, politics, weather and traffic reports.
Posted By: Bill Addiss Re: AM Radio? - 01/30/03 05:08 AM
Trumpy,

AM still has it's following. I think mostly among the 40+ crowd. My dad didn't even realize that his car radio did not get FM for years.

Bill
Posted By: Bjarney Re: AM Radio? - 01/30/03 06:07 AM
MP3 {internet} broadcasting and recording are becoming serious competitors to conventional radio.

And now there's the XM satellite stuff, too.
Posted By: SvenNYC Re: AM Radio? - 01/30/03 01:20 PM
The bulk of listening is on FM -- about 80 percent of the listening audience listens to FM. The remaining 20 percent listen to AM.

If you look at the ratings for most American cities, you'll find one AM - usually a high powered one near the top of the general 12-plus ratings - with a non-music type format (news/talk/sports).

AM is more and more turning into the home of specialty programming: "foreign" language stations (Chinese, Korean, Spanish), leased access (pay for your air slot) and religion.
Posted By: ThinkGood Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 12:48 AM
Gosh, I remember when KYW (note the K callsign) in Philadelphia, PA went to AM Stereo.

I never did understand what all the hype was about. They are an all-news station [Linked Image]

There is plenty of AM in use here in Northern NJ. Until I put Cat-5 in at home, the RF interference was louder than the other party asking "Do you have the radio on?"

Have a look at the US stations via: http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/reports/state_rs.cfm
Posted By: SvenNYC Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 02:47 AM
Thinkgood:

That's cuz all the NYC AM stations have their transmitters in your back yard!! [Linked Image]

Serioursly...for example if you take a trip out to Giants Stadium you will see the three towers that make up WEVD-1050 AM's array.

Since it's marshy water and open ground, it's perfect for AM.

The AM station's tower you seeis only half of the antenna. The other half is underground and consists of long copper radials, buried into the bog.

Thieves have been known to dig them up and sell the copper. This happened some decades ago to WCBS/WFAN's tower out on High Island, off the coast of The Bronx (here in New York).
Posted By: ga.sparky56 Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 03:21 AM
I remember WLS in Chicago was a very powerful am station in the late 60's and early 70's, 89 on the dial I think.Anybody else ever listen to rock and roll from there?
Posted By: Scott35 Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 05:11 AM
Oh ya, Awful... I mean Amplitude Modulation is still a widely used format here in So. California.

Not so much music, but many talk stations!

One certain station - with the pilot frequency of 640 kHz, will always be around (it is an alternate for some type of tracking signal, or something like that!).
It is also the station heard on POTS lines when something is screwed up - like poor connections or water damage.

Read awhile back about experimental Digital AM stuff, which would give similar results found on VHF FM broadcasts.

The typical VHF FM channel is 200 kHz wide, and normally includes Stereophonic info (also Quad!).
The HF AM channel is 10 kHz wide, so to get something nice for music inside this envelope, it would need to be compressed someway.
Also sending Digital Packets would reduce the Atmospheric noise that gets included when the audio info gets extracted from the carrier, and sent to the power amp.
(the crackles that are heard).

Scott35 S.E.T.
Posted By: pauluk Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 02:05 PM
AM was still going strong in rural Nebraska when I left there in '96. A lot of talk/news stations, parts of the public radio network with some quite interesting shows from time to time.

There were also plenty of oldies and country AM stations when I was in the South a couple of years before. (Completely unjust in my view that so many stations playing decent music go on AM while the FM band is full of the "Top 40" trash!)

Trumpy,
ThinkGood mentioned KYW in Philadelphia. Just in case you're not aware of this, in general U.S. stations have W callsigns east of the Mississippi River and K callsigns west of it. There are exceptions though, such as the old-time KDKA.

Another AM broadcast difference is that in the Americas stations are on a 10kHz channel spacing, whereas elsewhere in the world we are on 9kHz (e.g. 1152, 1161, 1170 etc.)

Scott,
In the U.K. AM broadcasts have always been constrained to a 4.5kHz audio bandwidth by the 9kHz channel spacing, but I seem to recall reading a few years ago that the FCC authorized some U.S. AM stations to broadcast a wider bandwidth signal, presumably only where it was deemed that the wider sidebands would not interfere with adjacent channels.

It struck me as rather odd at the time, as it would be of no benefit unless AM receivers were also designed for the wider bandwidth, in which case they'd be wide open to adjacent channel interference when tuned to weaker "normal" stations.

I have a feeling that the piece I read was in error, but can you confirm this?


[This message has been edited by pauluk (edited 01-31-2003).]
Posted By: Scott35 Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 03:17 PM
Paul,

I can give a little reference to AM broadcast stuff right now, and reply later with more detailed info.

Commercial AM radio broadcasts spectrum range = 540 kHz to 1.6 mHz.
Channel Size = 10 kHz (example: 540, 550, 560, etc.)
Bandwidth = 5 kHz (5 kHz of audio max.)
Envelope (Signal Composition): Double Sideband Full Carrier Signal (LSB / Carrier / USB).

The 5 kHz max. for audio information results in the "Muddy Mid-Range Only" sound, which drives me crazy!!!
The ease of atmosphere noise falling in, and being included with the audio information, is "Too Much B.S." for me to tolerate [Linked Image]

Let me see what the books say!

Scott35 S.E.T.
Posted By: pauluk Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 06:28 PM
Yes, they've been the standard specs for decades. Wasn't there talk of extending beyond 1600kHz to squeeze in some extra low-power local channels? Not much use for those with a receiver which won't tune up high enough!

AM broadcast here has become much more noisy over the years. The plethora of stations that have sprung up all over the U.K. and Europe coupled with horrendous levels of wideband interference from computers and all the other modern gadgets means that listening to anything other very strong local signals results in a lot of heterodyning and other assorted crackles, whistles, and noises.
Posted By: SvenNYC Re: AM Radio? - 01/31/03 07:57 PM
The MW band extension to 1700 kilocycles was done in the late 80s/early 90s.

Not all that many stations have moved there....besides you would only have room between 1600 and 1700 for maybe two stations

The warped (IMHO) reason for that extension was not to place new stations, but to move existing very low power stations to the new part of the dial where they could broadcast with higher power (10,000 watts daytime; 1,000 watts nighttime) and using a non-directional antenna.

The licence for the "old" station would be turned in after 5 years of the new "expanded band" station going on the air and would be deleted permanently.

Unfortunately things have changed.

Waivers have been granted and now in New York City we have a station on AM 1660 (WWRU) that broadcasts with 10,000 watts daytime and night-time and uses a directional antenna at night.

The stations may also be sold separately, which means the "old" station that would have been deleted continues to stay on the air in addition to the new station on the "expanded band".

Also, you may see some cheap radios where the dial goes up to 1700khz but the tuner mechanism is such bad quality that the radio may not tune up that high, or if it does it will start drifting off station. Had that problem with a small Philips pocket radio I bought brand new a couple of years ago. [Linked Image]

The space between 1600 and 1700 is THE WORST place for an AM station to be.

[This message has been edited by SvenNYC (edited 01-31-2003).]
Posted By: Trumpy Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 01:32 AM
Just a small question,
someone mentioned AM Stereo, this was mooted as a competitor to FM, when it was first brought out, tell me, did it ever take off where you are?, I've heard that it is used quite prolifically in Australia, we never got it over here in NZ, though, the broadcast authorities, thought it to be a waste of money.
It apparently has better Frequency Response
than standard AM Mono, is this true?. [Linked Image]
Posted By: electure Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 02:49 AM
Although I don't share Scott's dislike for AM 640 KFI:
They are a "Clear Channel" station, meaning no other station shares their frequency.(hence the 3 letter designation KFI).
50,000 watts of power, they occupy the CONELRAD (remember the old triangles on your radio?) frequency.
They are our best emergency station, and don't worry, they come through...they covered the 9-11 well.
I've even got KFI in Wichita, Kansas (conditions were right?)
In an emergency, they kick butt [Linked Image]...S
Posted By: SvenNYC Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 03:25 AM
Electure,

The three letter call sign has nothing to do with the channel designation.

It is merely a VERY old station...the first call signs given out by the Federal Radio Commision (predecessor to the FCC) used three letters (KHJ Los Angeles, KYW Philadelphia, WBZ Boston, WOR New York, WLS Chicago).

Some famous "clear channel" (not to be confused with the company of that same name) stations with four letter call signs that have been around forever are WABC New York, WEAF (defunct) New York, KABC Los Angeles, KIRO Seattle, WMAQ (defunct) Chicago.

The FCC no longer assigns three-letter calls. However in special cases, they will let you get your original three-letter call sign back if you happen to own the curent station at that exact dial position.

This happened a couple of years ago with KHJ/Los Angeles which had switched to KKHJ and then was permitted to change back to KHJ.

The reason was (and I'm not joking) because KKHJ was a Spanish statoin and management said that if you said the call letters in Spanish it would sound like this: KA KA ACHE JOTA (hard J).

In Spanish, KA KA (actually written caca) is slang for feces. So you get the idea. [Linked Image]

So now the station IDs itself as KA AHCHE JOTA (hard J)

Sorry.....I'm a radio geek...so this is one thread that got me hooked [Linked Image]
Posted By: electure Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 07:16 PM
Ooops.
Again my foot is in my mouth [Linked Image] Sometimes I'm a fountain of misinfo.

Interesting thing about 93 KHJ, they were very progressive in the 60's. I heard an interview with an "new,unknown" artist that played very odd music....Jimi Hendrix.

The KFI tower is just a few miles away, and yes, it's VERY old. I'll try to get a pic.
I've got 3 customers within about 2 blocks of it. One, next door to it, has nearly every fastener in the place tack welded, but was that the doing of some crazy engineer? Nothing else in the area has loosened up.
BTW, I heard long ago that Lucille Ball got KFI on her tooth fillings. Is this just another myth??...S
PS Sorry, there's no hard J in Spanish, but yes, the letter comes very close to another Spanish word for homosexual.
How about car names: Chevy Nova= No Va=No Go,
and the Ford Pinto didn't fare too well in Argentina where it's a slang term for genitalia



[This message has been edited by electure (edited 02-01-2003).]
Posted By: SvenNYC Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 08:30 PM
electure,

Sorry for that.

I meant an English H sound when pronouncing 'jota' - as in "hoe-tah" (so one doesn't confuse it with joe-tah) - the sound of getting phelgm caught in your troat after a cold... [Linked Image]

In Spanish, when used in a word, the H is silent (ex. hotel is pronounced O-tel)
Posted By: wocolt Re: AM Radio? - 02/01/03 09:17 PM
One of the problems with AM is the local oscillator of 455kHz if you are in a bad area where skips are present, you can pick up the same station on the lower end at multiples of the 455. If for instance in our area local AM station is 570 it can be picked up at about 1025 and again at 1480, Or sometimes, KDKA ou of Pittsburgh is 1020 that can be had on the lower end if atmospherics are right.
But with skips AM can be picked up all over the world where FM is almost line of sight.
In the Mediterranean(SP) we were able to WLS out of Chicago with a cheap transistor radio.
But as Scott said the guardbands on FM are great for getting rid of interference especailly locally.

WOC
Posted By: ThinkGood Re: AM Radio? - 02/02/03 06:05 AM
Trumpy:

Re: the AM Stereo--I don't know if KYW still broadcasts in Stereo. I don't have a clue if AM Stereo ever made a big wave...
Posted By: sparky Re: AM Radio? - 02/02/03 06:19 PM
Even FM isn't what it was in terms of diversity.

Quote
WASHINGTON -- To Don Henley's ears, the FM dial has been transformed from a bazaar of choices to a place where "everybody gets the same McDonald's hamburger."

apparently Clear Channel isn't helping as a monopoly..... [Linked Image]
Posted By: ga.sparky56 Re: AM Radio? - 02/02/03 06:40 PM
Sparky, isn't this type of thing what Teddy Roosevelt railed about 100 years ago? I think then it was oil and railroads, J. P. morgan and some of that crowd?
Posted By: ThinkGood Re: AM Radio? - 02/03/03 07:55 AM
TimeWarnerAOLVerizonMSNBCWorldComDisneyMCI, Inc.
Posted By: sparky Re: AM Radio? - 02/03/03 08:15 PM
lol~ exactly.

McCain'l have to play the hammer, in Teddy's absence.
Posted By: pauluk Re: AM Radio? - 02/06/03 12:51 AM
No Wolfman Jack broadcasting on clear channel out of Mexico these days either!
Posted By: electure Re: AM Radio? - 02/06/03 11:03 PM
Paul:
How on EARTH did you know about XERB, Rosarito, Mexico?
Wow, you're really an International.
Kudos from Scott...S
Posted By: Bjarney Re: AM Radio? - 02/07/03 01:31 AM
Doesn't every satellite ground station on the planet listen to XERB?
Posted By: pauluk Re: AM Radio? - 02/08/03 12:31 AM
Just a big fan of old music and broadcasting, so I've known of Wolfman Jack for years. Yep, I know about Alan Freed as well! [Linked Image]
© ECN Electrical Forums