ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photos of the Week:

Meter vs Bricklayer
Meter vs Bricklayer

Random Gallery Image:
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 19 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#94438 07/29/05 11:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Can someone tell me what the last line of Note 2 to Table 450.3(B) is talking about? The Note 2 for Table 450.3(A) makes sense but not the one for Table (B). 2002 NEC.


George Little
Horizontal Ad
#94439 07/30/05 06:24 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
They are almost identical.

Last sentence of note 2 Table 450.3(A)

"If both circuit breakers and fuses are used as the overcurrent device, the total of the device ratings shall not exceed that allowed for fuses."

Last sentence of note 2 Table 450.3(B)

"If both breakers and fuses are utilized as the overcurrent device, the total of the device ratings shall not exceed that allowed for fuses."

Am I missing something?


[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 07-30-2005).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#94440 07/30/05 08:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Yes they are the same Bob, but the difference is Table (A) they give reference to a different % for fuses than for breakers in some cases. In Table (B) they don't differentiate between fuses and breakers???

Maybe I'm missing something??

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 07-30-2005).]


George Little
#94441 07/30/05 08:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I get what you are pointing out now. [Linked Image]

I looked in some older NECs and found that as recently as 1996 both tables had separate ratings for fuses and breakers.

The 1999 Table 450-3(b) changed to what we see now.

I guess there was a proposal to change the table but not the notes.

Looks like you could put in a proposal.

You are certainly a careful reader of the NEC. [Linked Image]

Bob

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 07-30-2005).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#94442 08/02/05 06:35 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 103
J
jes Offline
Member
Hello George,
FYIW, I believe these notes to have nothing to do with the percentages in the tables, just the aggregate sum of the OCP ratings. For example, at smaller OCP values let's say you had 6 devices (for 6 circuits) and a 60 amp single device limit on the xmfr. You could have 6 fuses at 10 amps each. 3 fuses at 10 amps and 3 breakers at 15 amps would not meet the requirement in the note. (10 amps is not a standard breaker rating in 240). You probably can come up with a situation also with motors or another load where the permitted settings for breakers and fuses are different.

#94443 08/02/05 06:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Okay JES, I can buy into that but there doesn't seem to be any documentation anywhere. Kinda a seldom needed bit of information. Only a Code Geek such as myself would even pursue it [Linked Image]


George Little

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

Member Spotlight
Vlado
Vlado
Croatia
Posts: 28
Joined: February 2011
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 3
CSS 1
Popular Topics(Views)
366,493 Are you busy
289,473 Re: Forum
268,084 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5