ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Vibrator Supplies??
by gfretwell - 10/19/19 08:33 PM
FPE in Germany
by NORCAL - 10/16/19 08:24 AM
Help with aging employee advice.
by Bill Addiss - 10/15/19 10:58 PM
Fuse blower plug?
by gfretwell - 10/13/19 03:23 PM
Power factor and transformer efficiency
by TeslaEdison - 10/13/19 04:05 AM
New in the Gallery:
FPE Breaker panel in germany
What is this for?
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 31 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94375 07/29/05 10:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
A
Alan Nadon Offline OP
Member
Section 210.70 requires lighting outlets wall switched for habitable rooms, etc. There is an exception for switched receptacles.
The definition of a lighting outlet is an outlet INTENDED for the installation of a lampholder etc.
On final inspection the contractor put blank covers on the lighting outlets and claimed that the owner would select fixtures (luminaires) at some future date.
Should the inspector accept or reject ?
We are curious in Indiana, because it is a real situation.
Should the word intended be removed from the definition (Article 100) of lighting outlet,therefore requiring a lampholder, luminaire, pendant etc. ?
Alan-- Inspector.


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94376 07/29/05 10:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
L
Larry Fine Offline
Member
I would require at least a keyless; elsewise, the requirements are not met. Without a luminaire, there is no light.


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94377 07/29/05 11:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Accept it. We as AHJ's can't save the world.

I mean honestly, what do you gain from having them put in a cheesy keyless?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94378 07/29/05 11:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
D
DougW Offline
Member
Quote
Originally posted by Ryan_J

Accept it. We as AHJ's can't save the world.

I mean honestly, what do you gain from having them put in a cheesy keyless?


Or a $5.99 Orange Box single bulb & fluted glass fixture from China.

Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94379 07/30/05 12:06 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 615
J
Jps1006 Offline
Member
The advantage of keyless over a blank is a functioning light. Why the NEC has the requirement, I don't know specifically if it is for protetion from fire from what some clever people might do to get light, or if it to minumize the hazards of fumbling through a dark room. But for whatever the reason for the code, there is exposure to the hazard until the lights get picked out, ordered, delivered, and installed, which could be a long time. Mix some small kids in and who knows. Are ther bigger things in life to worry about, sure, but I don't think it is unreasonable to require a keyless. As an installer, I wouldn't leave a house for final with just blanks.

Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94380 07/30/05 03:18 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Alan:

Leaving that outlet with a blank cover is an accident waiting to happen!

I have called for the installation of at least a lampholder before signing off a final during my career.

Quote
Should the inspector accept or reject ?


REJECT!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94381 07/30/05 06:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
Quote
Section 210.70 requires lighting outlets wall switched for habitable rooms, etc. There is an exception for switched receptacles.

The definition of a lighting outlet is an outlet INTENDED for the installation of a lampholder etc.


You answered your own question.

The NEC requires a lighting outlet, that is all.

If the room uses a switched outlet would you require them to install a floor lamp before you signed off?

It is the same concept.

To me the NEC is crystal clear here, a lighting outlet is not a luminaire.

For those that say reject, please provide the code reference you would cite?

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94382 07/30/05 06:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
110.3(A)(8) and the approved plans and specifications!

Switched lighting are required, especially in bathrooms and kitchens!

Common sense, too!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94383 07/30/05 06:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
Quote
110.3(A)(8)


110.3(A)(8) does not allow an inspector to require items not required by the text of the NEC.

Quote
the approved plans and specifications!


We have built many condos that simply show lighting outlets without Luminaires. The Luminaires will be chosen by whoever buys the condo which may be long after the occupancy permit is released for the building.

Quote
Switched lighting are required, especially in bathrooms and kitchens!


No, lighting is not required by the NEC, lighting outlets are required in these locations by the NEC

Quote
Common sense, too!


Well that may be true, [Linked Image] but it is no way enforceable by an electrical inspector who works within the rules.

I would still like to hear why it is unsafe to leave a blanked up lighting outlet in a living room but it is perfectly safe to leave a switched outlet without a lamp in the same room.

It makes no sense whatsoever. [Linked Image]

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Proving Intent- Inspectors dilema #94384 07/30/05 07:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
E
Electricmanscott Offline
Member
I am with Bob on this. Perfectly clear to me as well. Joe you as a code guru who has been know to argue the literal wording of the code should certainly be able to see this. You yourself call the blanked up box an outlet. NEC requirement is met. Pass the job according to the code not personal opinion.

[This message has been edited by Electricmanscott (edited 07-30-2005).]

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 10
Popular Topics(Views)
259,745 Are you busy
195,070 Re: Forum
184,480 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3