ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
New fan motor for Panasonic
by gfretwell. 06/21/19 10:56 AM
Burning out of return(white) side of 120volt rec
by crselectric. 06/14/19 02:15 AM
Video door bell causing chime activation of coil
by JoeTestingEngr. 06/13/19 12:43 PM
Troubleshooting Voltage Drop Across Relay
by gfretwell. 06/09/19 11:49 AM
Apple Recalls Three-Prong Wall Plug Adapters
by Admin. 06/05/19 09:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 10 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
when? - 800A limit on next higher overcurrent device #91389
01/14/05 11:39 AM
01/14/05 11:39 AM
G
greg2468  Offline OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Houston
section 240.4(B) permits you to use the next higher standard rated fuse or circuit breaker when the conductor rating doesn't match the standard sizes (with certain restrictions). However, 240.4(C) limits this to 800A or less. I have heard that the 800A limit was not always there. My question is when did the 800A limit start? My oldest Code book is 1981 and it is still there in 240-3 exc. 1.

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: when? - 800A limit on next higher overcurrent device #91390
01/14/05 12:31 PM
01/14/05 12:31 PM
C
Creighton  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 59
Hayward, CA
First appeared in the 1962 NEC in Section 240-5,Exception No.1
There was no published report on proposals at that time, and there was no comment made in the NEC Handbook, so where the proposal came from is not known.
Creighton

Re: when? - 800A limit on next higher overcurrent device #91391
01/14/05 12:47 PM
01/14/05 12:47 PM
G
greg2468  Offline OP
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Houston
So then the restriction was added in 1962. When did the NEC start allowing you to use the next higher standard fuse or circuit breaker setting when your max conductor ampacity did not correspond to a standard size?

Re: when? - 800A limit on next higher overcurrent device #91392
01/30/05 11:56 AM
01/30/05 11:56 AM
E
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
The same 240.5.e1 rule also existed in the 1959 code book.

Re: when? - 800A limit on next higher overcurrent device #91393
01/30/05 12:46 PM
01/30/05 12:46 PM
E
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
Also, at that time, the largest "standard ampere rating for circuit breakers" was 800 Amps. Fuses had standard ratings up to 6000A and there was no restriction in the '59 code for going to the next higher standard rating...
Then, in the '62 code, there was a change that required an 800A limitation on going to the next higher standard rating, and they combined the wording so that both breakers and fuses were dealt with in the same exception.
Considering what Creighton has said about there not being any comment about the change in the '62 edition, I infer that the code change was done to clean up the disparity in language between the two types of overcurrent devices. Since it doesn't seem that the device technology (breakers vs fuses) was at issue, then I am thinking that it must have been a practical issue of putting a limit on the amount of space taken up by parallel wires. They might have noticed that switchboards weren't allowing enough wire bending space for a larger parallel feeder. In the '59 code, the ampacity of 500MCM THWN wire was 380 amps. Putting them "in multiple" (as they used to refer to parallel conductors then) would provide an allowable "current carrying capacity" (ampacity) of 760A..which would be just fine for that standard 800A overcurrent device.


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Radar
Radar
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 349
Joined: April 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Khombo 2
Popular Topics(Views)
255,843 Are you busy
191,821 Re: Forum
181,591 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.024s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9689 MB (Peak: 1.1045 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2019-06-24 19:34:15 UTC