ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Photo Editing Software?
by Fridayrack - 12/03/21 05:05 AM
Square D "All-In-One" Panelboard
by NORCAL - 11/30/21 12:48 PM
Where is Everyone?
by luckyshadow - 11/21/21 10:14 AM
It's been an interesting career
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:56 AM
Well I am back to stay (nearly 6 years)
by The Watt Doctor - 11/19/21 09:17 AM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 45 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#9105 04/17/02 06:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Dan,

Could you please discuss "prospective short circuit current" vs. "available short circuit current" vs. "instantaneous peak current".

Is the multiplier 2.3 a constant on all systems?

#9106 04/17/02 09:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 29
D
Member
Redsy,

Good to hear from you again.

In answer to your question. Prospective short-circuit current and available fault current are basically the same thing. Both reference a bolted fault condition (worst case).

However, when talking about the current-limitation of fuses, the term "prospective short-circuit current" is used when determining the let-through current of the fuse (peak and rms). The word prospective is used because the current never reaches that value since the fuse chops the current before it ever reaches that value.

The let-through charts are based upon a power factor of 15%, which relates to an prospective instantaneous peak current (during the first half cycle) of 2.3 times the prospective rms current, as suggested. This value is used because fuses are tested at a power factor of 15% (provided it is tested over 10kA...at 10kA the power factor is 50% which relates to a lower peak current). This is done to reflect real-life conditions during a short-circuit.

This information is useful becase the reduction of rms current (squared) relates to the reduction of thermal stresses and the reduction of peak current (squared) relates to the reduction of mechanical stresses. Thus if a device reduces the rms current by 10, the reduction of thermal energy is 100. If the fuse reduces the peak current by 10, the reduction of the mechanical stresses is 100.

If a non-current-limiting device was used the entire rms current and peak current could be let-through to the downstream equipment.

See the Bussmann SPD for more information under current-limitation and the let-through charts. Also, see the EDP-1 (especially the last page for peak current versus power factor) for more detailed information. Both documents can be found on our website under application info, pubs and applications.

Just as an fyi, if my memory is correct, circuit breaker are tested at 20% to 25% power factor based upon ampere rating above 10kA and at 50% below 10kA. Again, I would have to check the UL 489 standard to verify this though.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Joe Tedesco
Joe Tedesco
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 2,749
Joined: October 2000
Top Posters(30 Days)
NORCAL 1
Popular Topics(Views)
286,590 Are you busy
218,995 Re: Forum
205,108 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5