ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

100 Year old Lightbulb
100 Year old Bulb

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 108 guests, and 20 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#89690 10/13/04 07:59 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
M
Member
hi,
if i seal a conduit as required in a classified area, does this satisfy the requirement for rating a circuit as intrinsically safe?

thanks for any replies.

mustang

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,008
Likes: 37
G
Member
The short answer is no.
Intrinsically safe circuits are those that do not have the energy to cause a spark, it has nothing to do with protection.

See 504 definitions


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
M
Member
so if i run lighting to a pump house in an oilfield that is classified class 1 div 1 or class 1 div 2, then those ckts have to be intrinsically safe?

i never saw an intrinsically safe thhn..i have seen shielded cables and explosion proof fittings and enclosures...

the question came up because an inspector is requiring INTRINISCALLY SAFE CKTS at a refuleing station!

some of the control and POS is intrinsically safe but the rest of the building and ckts are normal ckts...these are in unclassified locations...

what could he mean?

here is the exact quote:

"COMPLY NEC 514.11 AND 514.13/SPECIFY ALL CIRCUITS INCL INTERCOMS, LO VOLT CONTROLS, COMPUTERS, INTRINSICALLY SAFE, ETC)."

these articles have nothing to do with intrinsic ckts...that i could tell..

thanks for the replies

mustang

[This message has been edited by mustangelectric (edited 10-13-2004).]

[This message has been edited by mustangelectric (edited 10-13-2004).]

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 220
T
Member
did the inspector just want disconnects that comply with those sections? I interpret the end of that quote as some kind of labeling/indentification requirement.

[This message has been edited by trekkie76 (edited 10-13-2004).]

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
M
Member
hi,
i am working from code comments...never spoke to him...maybe it will take a phone call or e-mail to figure it out..

i am still trying to figure it out!

thanks for the replies..

mustang

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Quote
so if i run lighting to a pump house in an oilfield that is classified class 1 div 1 or class 1 div 2, then those ckts have to be intrinsically safe?
I don't think that it is even possible to have an intrinsically safe lighting circuit. For an instrinsically safe circuit there must be no possible way to cause a spark that has enough energy to ignite the gasses, even if you short the conductors. Lighting would have to be of the type approved for the area classification and the raceways and seals will have to comply with Article 501.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Quote
"COMPLY NEC 514.11 AND 514.13/SPECIFY ALL CIRCUITS INCL INTERCOMS, LO VOLT CONTROLS, COMPUTERS, INTRINSICALLY SAFE, ETC)."
Is this installation a gas station? That is the application of Article 514. It does not apply to other classified areas.
The code sections cited require that there be a means of disconnect for all circuits of any type that serve a fuel dispensing unit, and do not apply to any other classified areas.
Don



[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 10-14-2004).]


Don(resqcapt19)
Horizontal Ad
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 86
N
Member
Mustang,
I have found that you have to really educate yourself regarding hazardous locations. A lot of inspectors are not completely informed of the requirements and therefore make guesses. If you are installing a light fixture it can not be made intrinsically safe. It must be a fixture rated and listed for the hazardous location with the proper raceway and seals. Usually only control items can be made intrinsically safe, such as float switches etc, using the proper components.
I had an inspector walk in on a job I did and condemned the job as soon as he saw thinwall. Kept repeating "All wiring in a hazardous location must be in rigid". He could not understand "intrinsically safe". Took a lot of my time meeting with him and his boss to get it approved. Because I took the time to read and read until I understood hazardous location wiring I was able to stand there, proud of the job, knowing I would not have to change anything. I'm sure if you ask the inspector face to face what his interpretation is you will both learn and the job will be safe.
Ron


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Joe Tedesco
Joe Tedesco
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 2,749
Joined: October 2000
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
340,650 Are you busy
266,020 Re: Forum
246,946 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5