ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
UL 508A SPACING
by ale348 - 03/29/24 01:09 AM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (ale348), 302 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#85082 05/28/03 08:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
[Linked Image from joetedesco.com]

Do you think that this type of wiring, left abandonded, should be removed if not in use or at least tagged or otherwise identified to indicate that it should not be energized?

I think I saw a rule in NFPA 1, does anyone have that publication so that we can compare the rule calling for removal?


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#85083 05/28/03 09:12 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
NFPA 1 Uniform Fire Code 2003 Edition
"11.1.4 Permanent wiring abandoned in place shall be tagged or otherwise identified at its termination and junction points as “Abandoned in Place” or removed from all accessible areas and insulated from contact with other live electrical wiring or devices."


Ron
#85084 05/29/03 04:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
That's actually better looking that 1/2 the stuff that is in use here.

Tagging (actually i would use permanent marker) would seem an easy request

#85085 05/29/03 06:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
For some areas, one approach might be a sign: "Keep Out -- Security Alarm Power." That could almost guarantee off-hours 'demolition'.

#85086 05/29/03 07:14 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
What defines "abandoned"? Is the meter pulled only until the next tenant apply's for power?

Roger

#85087 06/13/03 02:19 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 14
L
Member
hey , i could use that ol stuff at the farm!! LOL thats what my plumber buddy always says when he looks in back of my truck and sees ancient artifacts of electrical history [Linked Image]


[This message has been edited by LoneStar (edited 06-13-2003).]

#85088 06/16/03 09:05 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 47
G
GEO Offline
Member
have asked this many times,sometimes it causes attitude from some for asking.I--would require it to be removed, based on the PMC ,install and maintained in safe approved manner and 100i is required. GEO

#85089 06/24/03 10:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
J
Member
I am sure that the utility will be happy to remove their feeders- if they haven't already.
The new code requires 100 amp service- so a service change is in the future for this location (the meter ring shown is only rated for 60 amps).


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5