ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Smoke & mirrors?
by JoeTestingEngr - 09/19/20 10:00 PM
Pool Lights?
by Papa - 09/18/20 05:26 PM
Ever been afflicted by Gout?
by mbhydro - 09/15/20 05:50 PM
Questioning the electrical norms
by gfretwell - 09/13/20 01:17 PM
120/208 gives 240? please clarify
by NORCAL - 09/13/20 01:08 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83602 07/13/02 12:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
[Linked Image]

2002 NEC Section 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building.

This is NOT a Code VIOLATION! This image only shows how the rule was enforced by an Electrical Inspector in the Midwest.




[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 02-09-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83603 07/17/02 05:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
G
Gwz Offline
Member
I heard a story one time that the ingenious installer just built a box and filled it with concrete mix ie. no water.
The bag(s) said "concrete".

Glenn

Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83604 02/09/03 10:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
This picture was relocated from the Violations area, and is still there and closed.

This location here is a better place for this image to be posted so that it can be discussed by those who understand the specific rule in 230.6 and how it is supposed to be applied. [Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83605 02/10/03 12:02 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
G
ga.sparky56 Offline
Member
Joe,where would you as an inspector draw the line? Or could this be extended indefinitely?

[This message has been edited by ga.sparky56 (edited 02-09-2003).]

Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83606 02/10/03 03:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
While doing a remodel of a condo building we had to move the service from the cellar to the first floor lobby. We went about 30' into the building this way. We ran 2- 2" RNCs and the carpenters formed and poured them in.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83607 02/10/03 07:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
ga.sparky56

I personally would have allowed the service raceway here, containing the service entrance conductors to be installed without the concrete encasement.

There are millions of these installations around the USA. During my own career while inspecting service raceways in the Northeast, I have seen many that had to pass over the oil tank to reach the service equipment because of the entry into a basement.

I believe the LA City Code includes some rule that allows the raceway with service entrance conductors to be run into a building for more than 25 feet.

I don't have that Code, so I cannot be sure.

If someone from the Los Angeles area can take a look, I would appreciate that help.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83608 02/10/03 09:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
G
ga.sparky56 Offline
Member
Would this particular installation have been used to obtain the proper clearance from the corner w/o using a disco outside?

Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83609 02/10/03 10:25 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Joe Tedesco Offline OP
Member
I would say so, and the duct would have been a question as it relates to working spaces above, etc., rules


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83610 02/10/03 11:26 AM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 360
T
Trainwire Offline
Member
Pardon my ignorance here, but would it be a requirment for that lump of concrete to be tied to the wall, or can we just hang that much weight off of the box?

TW

Re: 230.6 Conductors Considered Outside the Building #83611 02/10/03 01:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
G
George Offline
Member
Since the maximum dimension is not specificed in the code, only the inspectors approval or disapproval makes it code compliant or not.

I don't think concrete should make us believe that the conductors are outside of the house. A drywall wrapping would appear equivalent.

A better location appears to be on the other wall, but I not would require that it be moved or that the conduit be placed in concrete.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Alan Belson
Alan Belson
Mayenne N. France
Posts: 1,803
Joined: March 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 8
NORCAL 3
Popular Topics(Views)
269,934 Are you busy
204,359 Re: Forum
192,577 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3