ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Recent Posts
Chinese motors rated 220 v 50 hertz
by gfretwell - 07/23/24 04:45 PM
100 Definitions: Accessible 2023
by gfretwell - 07/23/24 10:12 AM
100 Definitions, Likely to Become Energized, 2023
by gfretwell - 07/23/24 10:08 AM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by emolatur - 07/18/24 01:05 PM
2023 CEU Course
by gfretwell - 07/17/24 01:08 AM
Recent Gallery Topics:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 263 guests, and 38 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#81842 09/24/02 09:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
Steve T Offline OP
Someone posed this ? to me.

Can someone land branch circuit neutrals onto a terminal in a separate enclosure and then continue the run back to the panel with a larger wire.

Assume the hots are run thru the same conduit.

I know its a weird question, but it was posed to me and I would like to make sure I quote the proper code that would not allow this.

Horizontal Ad
#81843 09/24/02 10:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
You can if it is a "column" panel. See 300.3(B)(3). 225.7 and 215.4 would also permit a common neutral. What is the application involved in your question?

#81844 09/25/02 05:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 36
TE Offline
I don't have time to look it up, but I seem to recall reading something to the effect
that the grounded conductors must return
to the panel of the un-grounded conductor

I guess in theory that method would be returning to the panel of origin.

With so many possibilities and code exceptions, as resqcapt says
What is the application specifically?

#81845 09/25/02 09:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
Maybe 99NEC300-3. (b) Conductors of the Same Circuit—and—300-20. Induced Currents in Metal Enclosures or Metal Raceways.

#81846 09/26/02 06:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 7
I have seen a "neutral block" installed in a 10x10 troff (wireway), the #12 & #10 neutrals terminated on the "block" and a #1 neutral from the "block" to the neutral bus in the panel.

I have also seen the same arrangement with grounds terminated at the troff, and a larger ground terminated at the panel.

The above jobs were inspected and approved

#81847 10/03/02 08:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
Steve T Offline OP
This I believe was a typical residential service where the new panel was going to be in a new location. The contractor wanted to know if could use the existing neutral terminal and run one larger conductor from the old panel (which is now going to be gutted and used as a j-box) to the new panel, while carrying the hots for each of the existing circuits back to the new panel using separate conductors.

FYI-conduit is required in our municipality so separate cable runs are not a concern.

#81848 10/03/02 08:30 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Steve T

When will Chicago and some of the bedroom communities begin to allow other wiring methods such as "Romex or BX?"

What is the problem there?

Is it related to a concern over some older rules and political influence by the electrical inspectors?

Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#81849 10/15/02 10:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
Steve T Offline OP

I think you changed the topic, but just in case there is a correlation I missed...

Chicago is a strong union, steel manufacturing city. Fire statistics are supposedly low from electrical installations. (Not that I trust anyone's stats.) To answer your question, I doubt you'll see it unless a horribly corrupt union starts turning out unqualified electricians and problems start occuring.

I personally like the requirement because emt is a higher standard of installation than any type of cable. Additional circuit can be readily added or repaired or replaced with much less cost in the future.

EMT as an equipment grounding conductor is much more reliable than a wire over the long term life of an electrical system. Even BX that was allowed to be installed in Oak Park in the past is in many cases discovered with loose or disconnected connections. I see it every day. I constantly have to tell the electricians to tighten and secure BX connections that were "existing", when the back of bathroom, kitchen etc. walls get opened for a remodel.

I see much less old black pipe with loose connections. Also the walls did not have to get ripped open to replace the old cloth wiring.

If Romex was allowed, in my opinion, the number of non-code compliant, and severly dangerous installations would increase drastically in a period of 5 to 10 years.

I have worked in FL for a period of four years. The problems with electrical installations I saw in FL were more dangerous and much more costly to repair.

Of course, I grew up in Chicago and may have a biased opinion. Then again I may be completely objective.

Problem? Higher standards than the NEC is not a problem.

#81850 10/16/02 11:43 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 308
Steve T Offline OP
Oh by the way,

To date there have been almost 1200 electrical permits pulled this year alone in Oak Park. Oak Park has a population of about 60,000 and about 14,000 addresses. Having to run emt has not caused any type of slow down in construction.

#81851 10/16/02 04:18 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 83
Here! Here! I couldn't agree with Steve more.

Link Copied to Clipboard

* * * * * * *
Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
* * * * * * *

2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!

Member Spotlight
Orlando, Fl, USA
Posts: 49
Joined: August 2001
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
323,672 Are you busy
247,971 Re: Forum
231,748 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5