ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Violation?
by renosteinke - 01/27/23 09:52 PM
Does NEC 551.71 (F) apply to dwellings?
by BigB - 01/20/23 10:46 AM
Power submeter connections
by HotLine1 - 01/19/23 09:09 AM
AFDD's coming to the UK
by Texas_Ranger - 01/17/23 07:22 PM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 30 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#81765 09/17/02 01:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2
C
Junior Member
In a multi-family dwelling, the sub-panel is recessed in the wall. A water line has been run below the panel, through the framing members. This is a code violation, but how many of you think this is an issue? The dedicated space is for future expansion. I don't feel there will be any in this type of building.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

#81766 09/17/02 02:56 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 552
T
Member
Although art. 110.26(F)(1)(b) would permit it if it were above the panel.but not below it.I think it would have to be a judgement call by the AHJ on whether to allow it to remain.After all,the plumber could turn an ell up,run the pipe through a sleeve across the top of the panel,and then ell back down,which would make it code compliant but certainly be more in the way of the electrical.If I were the electrician I'd prefer below the subpanel


Donnie
#81767 09/17/02 04:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
Welcome to the forum.

On the scale of 1 to 10 with 10 meaning glowing red & smoking, I'd call this a 1 that has little chance of growing up to become a 10.

I read your profile & since you are the AHJ, you can waive some requirements by special permission, provided you feel that equivalent safety is being provided.

I'll echo the sentiments in the above post, I'd rather have a water line below.

I'd also get word to the plumber to let him know that he should stay out of this space.

Tom



[This message has been edited by Tom (edited 09-17-2002).]


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
#81768 09/17/02 08:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Chief,

Welcome to the board. Here in NJ we have something called a REHAB code which in short allows and existing panel to stay where it is. As someone else posted, I don't think of it as a big problem.

#81769 10/01/02 05:05 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 131
T
Member
Don't sweat the small stuff...
As long as it is safe. Seems like a better place to be below the panel than above. Common sense wise anyway.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Samurai
Samurai
Fl.
Posts: 46
Joined: May 2007
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 8
triple 3
Popular Topics(Views)
302,641 Are you busy
231,940 Re: Forum
216,590 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5