ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Old Fused Panel
 Old Fused Panel

>> Recent Posts
Parallel Conductors low voltage DC
by gfretwell - 09/06/24 01:37 PM
How's all our Non-US folks doing?
by grich - 09/04/24 11:10 AM
Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 32 guests, and 22 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#79199 12/03/01 04:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4
S
Junior Member
Do underground service entrance conductors installed by directional boring method rather than trenching require a warning ribbon?

Horizontal Ad
#79200 12/03/01 05:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Yes. There were proposals made to provide such an exemption, but they were rejected. The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation. If you want to bore you will have to do it twice, one for the cable and one for the ribbon.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#79201 12/04/01 09:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
As the result of a follow up question to me from Scott on this subject via e-mail I did some additional research. My original post is not entirely correct.
A proposal was submitted to the NFPA for a change in 300-5(d) for the 2002 code. This was proposal 3-43. The proposal asked that the following wording be added to 300-5(d): "Horizontally bored service laterals shall be exempt from this requirement." Code Making Panel 3 rejected the proposal with the statement that; "Present language only addresses trenching, not boring, thus boring is already excluded from the ribbon requirement".
This indicates to me that the panel did not intend to require a ribbon above cables that were installed by boring. It aprears to me, that based on the panel comment, if you are operating under the 99 code, a ribbon would not be required for conductors installed by boring. Also note the new wording applies to all underground service conductors, not just service laterals as in the 99 code.
Don(resqcapt19)

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 12-05-2001).]


Don(resqcapt19)
#79202 12/06/01 09:14 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
N
Member
Quote
The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation.
I agree with this statement more than the panels findings.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,158
Joined: May 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
327,657 Are you busy
252,533 Re: Forum
235,157 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5