ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Closet Meters
Meter Closet

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 32 guests, and 26 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#78532 10/03/01 05:53 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
I am not sure of why the new 2002 NEC does not show the bullet in the margin anymore to show the deletions? I found only this statement in the front"

"New or revised technical content in this edition is indicated by a vertical rule next to the paragraph, table, or figure in which the change occurred."

How are we supposed to know what has been deleted?


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Horizontal Ad
#78533 10/03/01 06:34 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
hmmmm,
Joe, do other NFPA documents follow suit?
it only costs a dot!
[Linked Image]

#78534 10/03/01 06:56 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
sparky:

The NEC was the only document I know of that used the bullet to identify the changes.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#78535 10/03/01 11:05 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
The IEE doesn't usually mark a specific regulation which has changed, but they generally mark any which have been deleted, e.g.

B.6 [This regulation deleted by March 1978 amendment]

#78536 10/04/01 06:27 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
I have been advised that the NFPA publisher's software did not support
the placements of the bullets in the "2002 National Electrical Code".

I have also been informed that the
marginal lines seem to appear in places where there were no changes, or
entire paragraphs were identified in the 2002 NEC.

If anyone has any further information please post it here where it concerns the 2002 NEC.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#78537 10/23/01 12:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 30
T
Member
Joe I have a list of locations I am keeping track of that are missing the vertical line. I will of gone through most of the NEC shortly and can post what I've found.

#78538 10/23/01 01:55 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Tom:

Any help will be appreciated, thanks!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Horizontal Ad
#78539 10/28/01 12:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2
E
Junior Member
I recently attended a 2002 NEC update seminar by James Stallcup in which he stated that the vertical lines are "not all there"

#78540 10/28/01 01:34 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
I don't know how many books are printed at one time, but last cycle, I bought a few Codebooks as soon as they were available. They included addendum sheets to cover oversights. I thought that I would wait a while this time.
BTW,
to contract with a company that can not provide the bullets that we have been accustomed to for how many years seems like a poor decision(at least for us) to me.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Attic Rat
Attic Rat
Bergen Co.,N.J. USA
Posts: 524
Joined: December 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 6
Popular Topics(Views)
329,934 Are you busy
254,767 Re: Forum
237,186 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5