ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Violation?
by renosteinke - 01/27/23 09:52 PM
Does NEC 551.71 (F) apply to dwellings?
by BigB - 01/20/23 10:46 AM
Power submeter connections
by HotLine1 - 01/19/23 09:09 AM
AFDD's coming to the UK
by Texas_Ranger - 01/17/23 07:22 PM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 28 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#77278 05/19/01 07:27 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 129
F
frodo Offline OP
Member
given a 6" rigid conduit that contains 3 1550 mcm and a 4/0 ground, which has a STANDARD seal located immediately where the conduit stubs up out of concrete, then the conduit terminates at a large pull box.

i feel that this is a violation because the conduit is allowed 40% fill, but the seal is restricted to 25%.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with these Exam Prep Combos:
 

>> Master Electrician Exam Prep     >> JourneyMan Electrician Exam Prep
 

#77279 05/19/01 08:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
I'm not going to do the math, I'll trust you.

You're correct that it is a violation to exceed the 25% fill unless the seal off is listed for more fill.

6" seal? Bet that was expensive.

Another thing I notice about seals is that a lot of guys like to use fiberglass insulation for the packing instead of the listed fiber made by the manufacturer of the fitting.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
#77280 05/19/01 08:43 AM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 129
F
frodo Offline OP
Member
Quote
Originally posted by Tom:
I'm not going to do the math, I'll trust you.

You're correct that it is a violation to exceed the 25% fill unless the seal off is listed for more fill.

6" seal? Bet that was expensive.

Another thing I notice about seals is that a lot of guys like to use fiberglass insulation for the packing instead of the listed fiber made by the manufacturer of the fitting.

Tom


thank you tom,

i have 8 gas turbines with generators that have this problem. what do you suggest would be the fix if the cables are installed?

can the code be disregarded? i beleive the intent of the code here is to acheive a proper seal...

i say that one violatation is as serious as another and that the situation should be brought into compliance...

this is a dc circuit that will carry a substantial current...

i want it fixed but it will be expensive...

#77281 05/19/01 03:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Seals are usually upsized via EXP redcuers to meet the fill, but i have never heard of a 7" or 8" seal.

#77282 05/19/01 04:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
What is the flammable fuel involved in this installation?
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
#77283 05/19/01 05:21 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 129
F
frodo Offline OP
Member
Quote
Originally posted by resqcapt19:
What is the flammable fuel involved in this installation?
Don(resqcapt19)

natural gas

class 1 div 2

gas turbines

#77284 05/19/01 06:09 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
G
Member
Is this a new installation or old work?

GJ

#77285 05/19/01 07:38 PM
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 129
F
frodo Offline OP
Member
Quote
Originally posted by golf junkie:
Is this a new installation or old work?

GJ

new installation at power house

#77286 05/19/01 08:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
G
Member
Then the contractor is responsible for the correction......unless it is in compliance with the engineering spec., in which case the engineer should pay.

GJ

#77287 05/19/01 08:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
What are you using as a basis for calling this a hazardous location? Is there some building code that is calling this a hazrdous location? Just because there is natural gas piping involved doesn't make this an explosion hazard, if it did, any house with a natural gas water heater would have hazardous locations.

I'm certainly not faulting your concerns about safety with the above questions, but I just can't see why sealing is required.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
mxslick
mxslick
Atomic City, ID USA
Posts: 806
Joined: October 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 9
triple 3
Popular Topics(Views)
302,561 Are you busy
231,910 Re: Forum
216,544 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5