ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
New tool
by gfretwell - 10/19/20 03:43 PM
Where is Everyone?
by Bill Addiss - 10/17/20 07:04 PM
Beyond Belief
by gfretwell - 09/27/20 12:03 AM
Questioning the electrical norms
by LongRunner - 09/23/20 06:38 AM
Smoke & mirrors?
by HotLine1 - 09/21/20 03:42 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 15 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
NEC 300-14 #76512 02/15/01 01:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1
R
rc Offline OP
Junior Member
NEC 300-14 requires at least 6"of free conductor to be left at outlet boxes. The question is--- Two NM-Bs come into a single gang box. Does it meet the intent of the code to take the two grounding conductors and slide on a crimp sleeve and crimp at the face of the box and then cut off one of the grounding conductors at the crimp sleeve leaving the cut off ground stopping at the face of the box?

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: NEC 300-14 #76513 02/15/01 01:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
When you're all done making your splices, you should still have 6" of conductor left. The method you discussed would leave one equipment ground too short. If you want to use that method, one of the cables needs to be about a foot long. The other option, which I personally prefer, is to pigtail the equipment grounds. This is where you can use up some of your short pieces of scrap wire.
Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: NEC 300-14 #76514 02/15/01 05:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
rc;
300-14 is really just addressing past sins in the trade.

The intent is free conductor, or conductor available for that sparky who is changing out worn devices 20 yrs from now.

I install exactly as you descibe, with one twist, i take advantage of 336-18's 12" and loop my incomming NM over the box neatly, to allow it to be pulled in by said future sparky.
[Linked Image]

Re: NEC 300-14 #76515 02/15/01 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
G
Glenn Offline
Member
Sparky,

What do you do about the 8" requirement for the single gang PVC box of 370-17(c)Ex.?

Glenn

Re: NEC 300-14 #76516 02/15/01 08:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
Glenn;
I believe that EX is in reference to those cheap boxes that do not hold the NM sheath.

I like to use the "accordian" method by which all conductors are folded into, and can fold out with, a device.

This is better done with a those plastic boxes that secure the cable.

If you really take a close look at those cheaper boxes , you could stick your pinky in it, even with a cable in the KO , evident by the last sentence of the EX.

The end result of this style box is an accumulation of dust, dirt and even larger debris over time.

This alone should constitue an "unused opening to be sealed", but that's another thread

[Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 02-15-2001).]


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
The_Lightman
The_Lightman
Orlando, Fl, USA
Posts: 49
Joined: August 2001
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
Popular Topics(Views)
270,700 Are you busy
204,939 Re: Forum
193,048 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3