ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Delco-Light Generator
 Delco-Light Generator

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 25 guests, and 25 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#76512 02/15/01 01:28 PM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1
R
rc Offline OP
Junior Member
NEC 300-14 requires at least 6"of free conductor to be left at outlet boxes. The question is--- Two NM-Bs come into a single gang box. Does it meet the intent of the code to take the two grounding conductors and slide on a crimp sleeve and crimp at the face of the box and then cut off one of the grounding conductors at the crimp sleeve leaving the cut off ground stopping at the face of the box?

Horizontal Ad
#76513 02/15/01 01:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Tom Offline
Member
When you're all done making your splices, you should still have 6" of conductor left. The method you discussed would leave one equipment ground too short. If you want to use that method, one of the cables needs to be about a foot long. The other option, which I personally prefer, is to pigtail the equipment grounds. This is where you can use up some of your short pieces of scrap wire.
Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
#76514 02/15/01 05:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
rc;
300-14 is really just addressing past sins in the trade.

The intent is free conductor, or conductor available for that sparky who is changing out worn devices 20 yrs from now.

I install exactly as you descibe, with one twist, i take advantage of 336-18's 12" and loop my incomming NM over the box neatly, to allow it to be pulled in by said future sparky.
[Linked Image]

#76515 02/15/01 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
G
Member
Sparky,

What do you do about the 8" requirement for the single gang PVC box of 370-17(c)Ex.?

Glenn

#76516 02/15/01 08:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
Glenn;
I believe that EX is in reference to those cheap boxes that do not hold the NM sheath.

I like to use the "accordian" method by which all conductors are folded into, and can fold out with, a device.

This is better done with a those plastic boxes that secure the cable.

If you really take a close look at those cheaper boxes , you could stick your pinky in it, even with a cable in the KO , evident by the last sentence of the EX.

The end result of this style box is an accumulation of dust, dirt and even larger debris over time.

This alone should constitue an "unused opening to be sealed", but that's another thread

[Linked Image]



[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 02-15-2001).]


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,158
Joined: May 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 6
timmp 2
Popular Topics(Views)
329,676 Are you busy
254,530 Re: Forum
237,009 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5