ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 205 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 19
F
Member
Quote
gfretwell
I have heard arguments that the regular spiral CF should never be mounted base up.
If that's the case then just about the only lights fixtures we could use CF's would be Table lights. Where did you hear this?

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I admit it is anecdotal but on usenet folks are trying to determine the cause of early end of life failures of CF lamps and they are usually in lampholders that hold the lamp base up. (cans, jelly jars etc)


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
I would not make too much of this "base up" stuff.

I have a few restaraunts as customers, and they all have CFL's in their cooking hoods. This is surely a location of elevated temps; being inside a "jelly jar" fixture makes sure it gets warm inside. The CFL's, according to my customers, far outlast conventional bulbs.

Likewise, I have a number of CFL's mounted horizontally, in open 'keyless' bases. Some CFL's last; others crap out inside a month.

I spoke with a man who has been in every factory (no kidding) that makes CFL's. His opinion of ALL of them is that they are pretty sloppy manufacturing facilities. I suspect that CFL failures are almost all due to poor quality control. You simply won't get the "beast and the brightest" when your manufacturing philosophy is "quickest and cheapest."

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 110
T
Member
When I needed to light a friend's new workshop the big orange box didn't have the right trim for the amount of light I needed, especially since I needed an IC rating. So I went with a PAR 38 CFL lamp and made it bright enough. 27W versus 120W, doesn't trip the thermal cutout.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
JJM,

What State are you in?

Typically, if you are figuring Loads on Branch Circuits, you would apply a Fixture's _MAXIMUM_ Wattage (if using Incandescent Lamps), and apply that Maximum rated Lamp Wattage as Volt-Amps (E x I or Watts = VA).

Example:
If the Fixture lists "100 Watt Lamp Maximum", then figure all of these type of Luminaires at 100 VA Each - regardless of the type / Wattage of Lamps installed.

If you are dealing with Fluorescent Fixtures (if CFL, only on Fixtures _WITHOUT_ Screwshells for Lamp Mounting), then ratings per Fixture corresponds to the Manufacturer's Specifications and Listed values.
Load VA may also be found on the Ballast.

Same goes for HID Lighting.

In a nutshell, if you are compiling data for Energy Conservation forms (or installing Lighting to comply with Energy Conservation Codes), the installed Wattage of a given Fixture is obtained from Manufacturer's Listings (look for "ANSI Watts" in cut-sheets).

Feel free to ask additional questions if needed.

Good luck.

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
Cheap electronic dimmers and motion sensors will kill CF bulbs in a hurry, I know that much. Does everyone already take that into account, or do people out there keep plugging CF bulbs into occupancy-sensor-controlled fixtures and gripe when they die after a month?

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5