ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Commercial lift stations
by triple - 06/09/24 05:23 PM
Stuff that happens after we leave
by gfretwell - 06/09/24 04:26 PM
photocell requirement for metal halide ballasts
by Wayles3 - 06/02/24 03:59 PM
Photo cell diagram for MH100w light
by Wayles3 - 06/02/24 07:32 AM
Chinese motors rated 59.9A 220 v 50hertz
by gfretwell - 05/30/24 08:48 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 30 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#6145 12/23/01 11:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 37
A
aphares Offline OP
Member
In the 2002 NEC, There is now a definition in Article 240.2 of a tap conductor. Does this definition change the tap rule, or anyhting. Example: would you be able to set a trough out side a building or structure, install tapped conductors from there, and into six disconnects (rule), without a main?
Any thoughts.....Or am I just way off base?

#6146 12/24/01 12:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
The definition was in 240-3(e) in the '99 code. There is no change in the application of the tap rules. The conductors in your example are not taps per the definition as they are service conductors. I see no problem with your example as long as the conductors leaving the trough have an ampacity at least equal to the OCPD installed in the disconnect. Of course the six disconencts would have to be grouped and nearset the point of entrance of the conductors.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5