ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Historical NEC Info
by gfretwell - 06/03/23 02:15 PM
Water heater 208 vs 240
by gfretwell - 06/02/23 06:26 PM
Help Finding Fault
by gfretwell - 05/30/23 10:05 AM
Countertop Receptacles
by HotLine1 - 05/18/23 12:40 PM
Windows 10, who's upgraded?
by LindaParker - 05/15/23 04:29 AM
New in the Gallery:
Burger King crown sillyness
Burger King crown sillyness
by wa2ise, December 11
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 117 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
Member
[Linked Image from kellyelectric.electrical-contractor.net]

Click Here if chart is not visible...

If that doesn't work, copy and paste this URL into your address bar:
http://kellyelectric.electrical-contractor.net/photos/Chart.jpg

If that doesn't work, go here .

A rough probability based upon hypothesis (read: BS) concerning the risk of fire for device failure. This could also be applied to splices. The chart shows a minimal (but not 0%) risk before the arcing takes place, rises to peak, then settles back down to a moderate risk.

What are your feelings on this?

Is this a reasonably accurate description?

[This message has been edited by sparky66wv (edited 11-25-2001).]


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
It seems incomplete to me.
Are they saying that once a device has failed the likelihood of fire increase to a certain point in time and then decreases if a fire hasn't already occurred?
Or are they saying that as a device ages, the risk of fire increases over time until a point at which, if a failure hasn't occurred yet, the likekihood of one occurring will decrease?

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
Member
Sorry, I thought of this while troubleshooting a house the other day. I was trying to find a way to explain to a customer the risk probability of "leaving things the way they are and fixing them when they go bad" type of thinking... you know, the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality.

Of course, what was I thinking... I don't want or need the work, couldn't find the problem, rigged the gas furnace so that it would work and told her to call another electrician. One of those "it'd be easier if you bulldoze it to the ground and start over" type jobs... Lot's of DIY work, falsely grounded receptacles, twist-n-tape splices, etc.

She asked if it was safe, which started me on the tangent...


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC Now Available!
 
* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 11
BigB 4
Popular Topics(Views)
307,118 Are you busy
235,113 Re: Forum
219,249 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5