ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
HVDC Greece to Crete
by gfretwell - 08/06/20 02:28 AM
310.15 (B) 7 Feeders
by HotLine1 - 07/31/20 02:29 PM
What would be the ideal solution?
by Fleppin - 07/21/20 12:42 AM
NESC question
by gfretwell - 07/16/20 04:17 PM
Code Violation or just not good Practice?
by HotLine1 - 07/16/20 03:03 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 11 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Addressable Fire Alarm #53333 06/21/05 10:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
master66 Offline OP
Member
When using fire alarm MC (18-2 twisted shielded pair) to wire an addressable fire alarm system what is the proper method for splicing the "drain" wire when making "T-taps"?

I was told to twist them together in the JB then wrap them with tape to prevent them from touching the metal JB thus preventing ground-faults.

Is the shield coming in contact with a grounded surface the cause of ground-faults?

Is this the correct way or not and why.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53334 06/22/05 04:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
Why the heck are you making T-Taps?

Quote
Is the shield coming in contact with a grounded surface the cause of ground-faults?

Without a doubt.



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 06-22-2005).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53335 06/22/05 10:51 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Quote
Why the heck are you making T-Taps?
Why not? That is one of the big advantages of an addressable system. It is listed as a Class B supervised circuit even with T-Taps.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53336 06/22/05 01:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
R
Ron Offline
Member
If the drain wire is insulated relative to the MC jacket, then it should remain isolated from the j-box and any raceway. It is typically terminated on the control panel end only. A drain in contact with the j-box when it should be isolated is unrelated to the condition of the communication conductors making contact with the drain or the MC jacket.


Ron
Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53337 06/22/05 04:44 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
Quote
Why not? That is one of the big advantages of an addressable system. It is listed as a Class B supervised circuit even with T-Taps.

Don I am fully aware it is allowed, many things are allowed, that does not mean they are all good ideas. I will not do it, and the engineers in my area will not draw it that way.

The OP did not state it was class B and in my area class B is pretty much history.

In RI for instance even if the panel is only Class B the EOL must be brought around back to the panel. If the panel is Class A capable the system must be wired Class A.

If I recall most of the manufactures only allow one device per T-Tap.

It surprises me you think this is an advantage.

Ron, the panels I work with will indicate ground fault if the shield touches ground.

Siemens for instance is very sensitive to shield grounds.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53338 06/22/05 04:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 124
P
poorboy Offline
Member
Have done several addressable systems, and have had problems that were instantly gone when an untaped shield or drain wire was found in contact with a steel box mounted on steel studs. They were not ground troubles, but various data problems. I usually tape each cable's drain separately before connecting them to the other cables because it is so much easier to take apart and put together the cables later if you have to troubleshoot. I have never seen anything like these supervised systems that makes a man have to do so much unwirenutting and rewirenutting over the course of getting all the bugs out.

T-tapping was always OK with the large well known manufacturer whose product we installed...the system instantly goes into a trouble condition if any device does not report in, no EOL needed. This is only the initiating circuit, however. The audio/visual circuits in the systems we did were always run in supervised loops with no t-taps. They were not addressable.

[This message has been edited by poorboy (edited 06-22-2005).]

Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53339 06/22/05 07:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 315
L
luckyshadow Offline
Member
Yes - be sure to insulate that drain wire. If "t" tapping just join all the drains together and tape them very good.
You only attach those drains at the panel- any where else and you will have troubles when you turn on the system. I do not like "T" tapping. sticking with straight in and out makes trouble shooting much easier.
Just my 2 cents

Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53340 06/22/05 08:02 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10
P
plcnewbie Offline
Junior Member
I like to use heat shrink tubing on the drain wires. In and out is better than tee
tap in my opinion.

[This message has been edited by plcnewbie (edited 06-22-2005).]

Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53341 06/22/05 08:25 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
master66 Offline OP
Member
It is true that the big advantage of an addressable system is the ability to T-tap.

There should be no problems because each device (smoke / heat detector and pull stations
) will have thier own unique "address". Each device periodically is verified by the control panel and if the device does not respond the system goes into trouble. So yes, we will be T-tapping but we will keep it to a minimum. The horn/strobes are looped with an E.O.L. resistor.

Also, as to keeping the drain isolated from ground. I was just told "Thats the way we always did it." I hate that answer. I always want to know why. Thanks for all the responses.

Brian

Re: Addressable Fire Alarm #53342 06/22/05 08:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,721
Scott35 Offline
Broom Pusher and
Member
The problem(s) resulting from the Cable's Shield being connected to "Ground" at multiple points, come in the form of "Ground Loops".

Connecting the Drains to a single common "Ground" point, removes the possibility of Loop Currents being shuttled around... provided the Cables are terminated correctly.

As with most Cabling and Electronic stuff, a "COMBUS" - like what you are installing Cables for, should have "Grounding" connections terminated in a "Star" fashion (all bond at the same point).

With a "T" Tap, the tapped loop segment(s) don't bond Shields Directly to the Star Point, instead they bond kind of Vicariously via the "Trunk".

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
RH1
RH1
California
Posts: 22
Joined: August 2009
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 3
andey 1
Popular Topics(Views)
268,631 Are you busy
202,967 Re: Forum
191,344 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3