ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Baseboard Mounted Light Bulb Socket
by SPSchuman. 07/15/19 03:22 PM
Hunter Fan Recalls Brunswick 3 & 4 Light Fans
by Admin. 07/11/19 11:08 AM
Honeywell Recalls some Smoke Sensors
by Admin. 07/11/19 11:03 AM
New in the Gallery:
What is this for?
Plug terminals
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 9 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49593
03/10/05 05:25 PM
03/10/05 05:25 PM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49594
03/11/05 07:35 AM
03/11/05 07:35 AM
electure  Offline

Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,280
Fullerton, CA USA
'Bout Time

Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49595
03/11/05 10:36 AM
03/11/05 10:36 AM
R
rogersan  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 23
La Mesa, CA, USA
Hey go easy on us Californians we are trying to save a tree by not using new paper for this code OK?


It does not matter if you win or lose but how you lay the blame :-)
Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49596
03/11/05 03:47 PM
03/11/05 03:47 PM
E
e57  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
S.F.,CA USA
I don't think there will be any problems in changing NEC in California, and welcome the 2002, as I don't have to by a new copy! [Linked Image] And changes are minimal....

But.... Changing California Title-24 is a different story, it is what I have described as "Draconian". Huge sweeping changes in design, that will defininately take the unaware by surprise.
http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2005standards/2004-11-04_400-03-001F.PDF

Or for an over-veiw: http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/earlycompliance/2004-06-03_LIGHTING_STNDS.PDF


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49597
03/12/05 02:06 AM
03/12/05 02:06 AM
S
SolarPowered  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
Palo Alto, CA, USA
Yes. It would seem that we citizens are just too stupid to make good decisions about what kind of lights we want in our homes, so our betters, in their infinite wisdom, are telling us what we are allowed to do.

[This message has been edited by SolarPowered (edited 03-12-2005).]

Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49598
03/12/05 06:44 PM
03/12/05 06:44 PM
Lostazhell  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,431
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Or...
Does this mean no more Knob and Tube? [Linked Image]

Re: California Adopts the 2002 NEC #49599
03/13/05 11:48 PM
03/13/05 11:48 PM
electure  Offline

Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,280
Fullerton, CA USA
Looks like plug-in lamps will be very popular.

I like the idea that the 2005 Title 24 is 151 pages long for both the residential and non-residential manuals combined.

The 2001 Title 24 Energy Code:

Residential Manual 286 Pages
Non Residential Manual 313 Pages
---------
599 Pages

Residential Appendices 256 Pages
Non Residential Appendices 314 Pages
---------
570 Pages

The book doesn't really make for interesting reading. I'll take 151 over 1166 any day! [Linked Image]


[This message has been edited by electure (edited 03-13-2005).]


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Attic Rat
Attic Rat
Bergen Co.,N.J. USA
Posts: 524
Joined: December 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 5
Popular Topics(Views)
257,104 Are you busy
192,936 Re: Forum
182,593 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9860 MB (Peak: 1.1400 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2019-07-19 09:02:53 UTC