ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Happy Thanksgiving
by gfretwell - 11/24/20 05:44 PM
What does your work place look like?
by HotLine1 - 11/23/20 03:35 PM
Where is Everyone?
by Lostazhell - 11/21/20 04:17 AM
Ground fault remover :-)
by dsk - 11/21/20 02:47 AM
Work Gloves?
by gfretwell - 11/20/20 10:17 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (NJwirenut), 21 guests, and 16 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
service disconnect location #41434 08/26/04 06:58 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 613
S
shortcircuit Offline OP
Member
I have a job where a one family dwelling with a good 100 amp service is exsisting feed from a overhead drop.The building is being converted to a condex with 2 units and the 2nd unit is going to be a complete new addition to the exsisting one family to make the 2 units.I don't want to disturb the exsisting 100 amp service.I don't think the poco will let me add a new service to the new addition on the other side of the building with the exsisting 100amp service staying on the opposite side which would create 2 service drops to the same building.So I was going to just add another 100amp service with the main in the meter can right beside the exsisting service and run a SER feeder through the exsisting unit to a sub panel in the new unit. Would this be a violation of 230.72 that says the disconnects shall be grouped?

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: service disconnect location #41435 08/26/04 08:19 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
Assuming your load calc's are done for this additional load. You may be required to add a "house meter" in this conversion, and still only have one service drop or connections from the POCO. (230.2) So why not a 3 meter/main base, and sub all the circuits? Otherwise its a grounding/bonding PITA! Why attempt to keep the original?


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Re: service disconnect location #41436 08/27/04 04:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 613
S
shortcircuit Offline OP
Member
e57...the exsisting 100 amp service is in great condition,so I want to leave it as is and add another meter with main for the other side being added.There is no need for a house meter with just 2 units.It will be less money to add just the 1 service as compared to changing the whole thing to a 2 meter/main with sub feeders.My question is if the disconnects being not grouped by having the exsisting one in the basement and the new one in the meter/main outside being in violation of 230.72

Re: service disconnect location #41437 08/27/04 10:18 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
earlydean Offline
Member
Yes, it would be a violation of the grouping rule.
Are you sure you can't have two service drops? If the other condo is separated from the first by a firewall, you have 2 buildings in one structure, and a separate service on the other half would be permitted.


Earl
Re: service disconnect location #41438 08/28/04 12:08 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
D
DougW Offline
Member
I believe that, despite firewalling, for a 2-unit structure the D/C's should be in one location.

Usually single drop and D/C exemptions are only allowed on really BIG structures (5K+ ft2 each) serving different occupants in our area.

The 2 meter/main to 2 subpanels is probably going to be your answer. Hopefully you can convert the existing panel without too much trouble.

[This message has been edited by DougW (edited 08-28-2004).]

Re: service disconnect location #41439 08/28/04 04:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
earlydean Offline
Member
The firewall rule has been around for years. Take a look at some duplex "row houses". They have firewalls between each unit, and service drops one to each, all in a row down the street.
They are just as safe as dropping services to single family homes. If one should happen to burn to the ground, the others will remain standing, and will be occupiable, as the electric service hasn't been damaged because it was attached to the part that burned. In that regard separate services are preferred.


Earl
Re: service disconnect location #41440 08/28/04 04:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
D
DougW Offline
Member
I believe you... and I understand the safety aspect with the firewall.

(I missed the part about it being an entirely new addition. Oops.)

It's just that I've just never seen it in my area. They try to minimize the OH's wherever they can. Different AHJ, different local Code, and different interpretation, no doubt.


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 9
Popular Topics(Views)
271,918 Are you busy
205,794 Re: Forum
193,888 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3