ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Joe T's Hall of Shame
Joe T's Hall of Shame

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 36 guests, and 29 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#4098 09/09/01 06:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 141
A
amp-man Offline OP
Member
Hey y'all,

Just did a job replacing flourescent lights in a kitchen with can (recessed) lights.

These are IC-rated housings (Junos). Because of the layout, two of the housings were installed snug against a joist. Also I used the Arlington black plastic button Romex clamps rather than metal clamps.

I figured that if the cans are safe to bury in insulation, it doesn't matter if they're up against a joist. What do you think?

Also, a guy at my supply house made the comment that the thermal cutoffs for cans are unnecessary now because of a change in the way insulation is made (the guy claimed that insulation used to have a trace of oil in it). He said that he's known electricians who bypassed the thermal cutoff if the fixture was routinely cutting off...
The whole line seemed like bull to me. Anyone who'd bypass a thermal cutoff seems to be putting the residents at risk from fire. Any comments?

Horizontal Ad
#4099 09/09/01 07:21 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
S
Member
Myself i've about had it up to my eyeballs with supply house guru's, most of which know all about our trade but do not practice it in the field.

they remind me of the old addage, some people work harder at avoiding work than working itself.

#4100 09/09/01 08:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Member
It seems that 410-66(a)(2) provides approval for your installation.
As far as bypassing a thermal safety device, it is not only un-ethical, it borders on criminal!

#4101 09/09/01 10:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
Member
bypassing a thermal overload is like putting a penney in an old fuse holder dumb-dangerous-stupid. any electrician who does so deserves to lose his/her license.


ed
#4102 09/23/01 10:46 AM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19
D
Member
First of all DO NOT bypass the thermal the Juno IC rated can is UL listed as an assembly and under no circumstances should be removed or altered. In answer to the second Question (can this fixture be installed in direct contact with combustible materials)(the Joist). Yes if it is a Juno IC rated Air-Loc ready style recessed no other Juno recessed fixtures are allowed within 1/2 in. to combustibles.


Work smarter not harder [Linked Image]


| )ubli| |

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Potseal
Potseal
Saskatchewan
Posts: 264
Joined: February 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 1
Popular Topics(Views)
338,285 Are you busy
263,701 Re: Forum
244,031 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5