ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
How's Florida doing with Hurricane Ian?
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:41 PM
Tough being a lineman's kid
by Bill Addiss - 09/28/22 12:39 PM
GFCI's pops in large numbers
by dsk - 09/26/22 04:35 AM
AFCI’s Revisited
by sparky - 09/24/22 09:58 AM
NFPA Price Increase Coming
by Bill Addiss - 09/23/22 02:22 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 33 guests, and 22 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#34147 02/02/04 07:02 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17
S
Member
I was reading about how a tie breakers prevents paralleling of busing from two transformers to supply two loads. So normally these each feed their own load, but if one transformer fails, you can feed both loads from one transformer.

But what would be the result of paralleling bussing, like combining A phases of two different souces? I dont see any direct short happening. Any ideas on what would happen?

#34148 02/02/04 07:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
As long as the cycles are in sync you would have twice the current.

This happens when you parallel gensets.


EDIT: changed "sink" to "sync". [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-03-2004).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
#34149 02/02/04 09:49 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
There is another situation that could occur also. If the transformers primaries are different sources, and one of these sources were to be turned off for servicing, you would have a reverse angle and some one working on the source of the supposedly dead side would be subject to full primary voltage.

I know this would be unlikely, just wanted to throw it out on the table.

Roger

#34150 02/03/04 12:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17
S
Member
OH,that's a good point, I was looking for the safety issue at hand.

#34151 02/03/04 12:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
Hopefully, the installation was engineered and commissioned to accommodate phasing and synchronization of the two sources, whatever they are. There should be construction drawings and acceptance test reports that bear this out. If the tie is at low voltage, a phasing check can be conducted with a power-rated voltmeter. Post again if you need more information.

Another aspect that should have been considered, if all breakers are simultaneously closed—a “closed transition”—the available fault current on the buses roughly doubles, and the gear should be so intended.

#34152 02/04/04 04:22 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 26
I
Member
Electric utility substations quite often have such a scheme. We normally have low side bank breakers at the output of the two transformers and a bus tie breaker between the buses. If either transformer fails its low side breaker is opened and the bus tie breaker is closed. There are interlocks to make sure that a failed transformer is not energized from the low side.

#34153 02/05/04 01:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 394
B
Member
If you lose one source and everything is paralleled, you find yourself in the position of trying to backfeed the down source by passing current through your equipment. Not at all healthy for your stuff.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 3
Popular Topics(Views)
297,660 Are you busy
228,454 Re: Forum
213,309 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5