ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 483 guests, and 27 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 2
D
New Member
I have an out building 90 feet from a manufactured home service. There is a 100 amp breaker that feeds into pvc underground. I originally had 2 copper 2's and an 8 ground. The machine that I ran needed no neutral. That set up appears to be legal?
Now, however I need to make a change. I want the out building to have a 50 amp panel to feed 120 and 240 volt loads and another sub panel.

It would seem simple. Change the breaker to a 50 amp and add a #6 neutral . Now it would be legal. Right?
Wrong! By downsizing the breaker from 100 to 50 I am breaking the law. By cutting the amps in half I now have an unsafe ground wire. The 8 gauge ground that was perfect with a 100 amp breaker is now dangerous with the fifty?

I assume it will either catch on fire or electrocute someone.

The problem for me is I only have a 1 inch pvc sch 40 conduit under the driveway to work with. My choices to fix this are:

Pull a number 4 copper and a 6 wire that would become the neutral. But the number 4 is 1.2 % smaller then what I need according to the NEC. If I pull another 2, which would be excruciating, then I don't have room for the neutral.

I could pull out 180 feet of number 2 and throw it in the trash and replace it with four number 6 wires. Along with the aforementioned 50 breaker. Now I am legal. The problem there, besides wasting 180 feet a perfectly fine copper wire, is that from the out building I am feeding another panel, 50 amp, that is 200 feet away. If I do use all number 6 wire then that would be illegal because of voltage drop.

Another problem is that when I pulled the number 2's I hunted around through the shop to find a spare roll of green 8. Could not find it so I used red eight for the ground. So now that is illegal and can not be painted or taped green because of the dangerous condition it would create.

Another approach that I have yet to investigate is something about only running 3 wires and driving in ground rods. Doesn't sound all that great in my case although might be legal. In fact maybe it is legal? You would think that having two 2's ( black) and a number 4 ground wire (taped green) or actual green, and a 6 neutral white would be better but the nec says it's not, because of the puny little # 4 ground wire. It's too small for the reduced size of the breaker.

I am frustrated and stymied on what is the best approach. We just paid 5k to have the driveway fix so I am trying to avoid ripping that up.

I would appreciate opinions on this.

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,048
Likes: 38
G
Member
Working in reverse order. 3 wire feeders to out buildings using the neutral as the ground has been illegal for 30 years. (96 code change)
So that is out.
I am not sure why a #8 ground would not work with a 50/60a breaker. 250.122 says you could use a #10 but if the ungrounded conductors are up sized for voltage drop, #8 is proportionately up sized.. What are you looking at?

You still need a rod and a local disconnect in that building. If the panel is near the door fewer than 6 breakers, that can be the disconnect.
The red ground wire is a legal challenge but I bet if you stripped it as far back as you can see nobody would notice. Slip some green shrink tube over it to improve the aesthetics.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 2
D
New Member
Thanks for the reply.
Yes, three wire run with neutral/ground combination is out.
The red wire can be stripped.

But the up sizing is the problem. It has to be proportional to the raise that would be made from #6 to #2. Using the formula I found online, subtract the old number from the new number in circular mils. 133,100 minus 26,240 equals 116,590 and divide that by the old number 26,240 equals 4.07. This means I have to enlarge the ground by four which is a #4 wire.

If I pull a #6 neutral and a #4 egc I have met the code. But I have a small neutral wire. In 100 years the large #4 wire that is the ground, if nothing breaks or goes wrong, will never see any current on it. Kind of useless. The smaller #6 that I had room for will be busy carrying electrons everyday. You would think the nec would be concerned about that.

I had another idea yesterday. (Didn't work)

What if I put in a 75 amp breaker instead of going to a 50? For the 75 amp breaker I would need #4 wire but I have up graded to #2. 133,100 minus 41,740 equals 91,360 divided by 41,740 equals 2.18. So with the 75 amp breaker I have to increase the ground by 2 times. This means going from a #8 to a one with 33,020 circular mils. Which they don't have so back to #4. And a #4 for the neutral.

Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 22
T
Member
Originally Posted by Dougw2007
I have an out building 90 feet from a manufactured home service. There is a 100 amp breaker that feeds into pvc underground. I originally had 2 copper 2's and an 8 ground. The machine that I ran needed no neutral.
../...
Now, however I need to make a change. I want the out building to have a 50 amp panel to feed 120 and 240 volt loads

I ran into a similar issue at a remote site, a pole service 240V Delta and only 240V brought some distance to a shack, then they said they needed some '120V' loads, while I had s similar conundrum with neutrals and such upon closer examination it was revealed the '120V load' was actually wide range 90-265V and would run fine off '240'. Last I checked the NEC in the US only required 120V for inside residential dwelling units, so this remote site runs off 240V, including LED yard lighting.
I did have to use 2-pole switching as the 240 is Line - Line but it was a low cost solution and beat adding a neutral to a long run. So you might consider what the 120V load is and if it really needs to be '120'. Another option is a small auto transformer. I have seen this at remote sites that need just 1 service GFCI but the rest is 240.
Cheers

Last edited by tortuga; 03/14/26 05:33 PM.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,048
Likes: 38
G
Member
I would see what the AHJ says before I did anything.
Let him explain the violation to you.
If that EGC was legal at 100a, I would have a hard time saying it wouldn't be OK at half the amps.
At that distance #2 is far beyond what you would need for "voltage drop"


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 7
L
New Member
Originally Posted by Dougw2007
I have an out building 90 feet from a manufactured home service. There is a 100 amp breaker that feeds into pvc underground. I originally had 2 copper 2's and an 8 ground. The machine that I ran needed no neutral. That set up appears to be legal?
Now, however I need to make a change. I want the out building to have a 50 amp panel to feed 120 and 240 volt loads and another sub panel.

It would seem simple. Change the breaker to a 50 amp and add a #6 neutral . Now it would be legal. Right?
Wrong! By downsizing the breaker from 100 to 50 I am breaking the law. By cutting the amps in half I now have an unsafe ground wire. The 8 gauge ground that was perfect with a 100 amp breaker is now dangerous with the fifty?
The issue isn’t simply about swapping breaker sizes but ensuring conductor sizing, grounding, and code compliance all match together. Downsizing can introduce unexpected compliance concerns depending on wiring setup . In control circuits or monitoring setups, precision parts like OPA2320AQDGKRQ1 are often used to maintain stable signal performance alongside proper electrical design.
I assume it will either catch on fire or electrocute someone.

The problem for me is I only have a 1 inch pvc sch 40 conduit under the driveway to work with. My choices to fix this are:

Pull a number 4 copper and a 6 wire that would become the neutral. But the number 4 is 1.2 % smaller then what I need according to the NEC. If I pull another 2, which would be excruciating, then I don't have room for the neutral.

I could pull out 180 feet of number 2 and throw it in the trash and replace it with four number 6 wires. Along with the aforementioned 50 breaker. Now I am legal. The problem there, besides wasting 180 feet a perfectly fine copper wire, is that from the out building I am feeding another panel, 50 amp, that is 200 feet away. If I do use all number 6 wire then that would be illegal because of voltage drop.

Another problem is that when I pulled the number 2's I hunted around through the shop to find a spare roll of green 8. Could not find it so I used red eight for the ground. So now that is illegal and can not be painted or taped green because of the dangerous condition it would create.

Another approach that I have yet to investigate is something about only running 3 wires and driving in ground rods. Doesn't sound all that great in my case although might be legal. In fact maybe it is legal? You would think that having two 2's ( black) and a number 4 ground wire (taped green) or actual green, and a 6 neutral white would be better but the nec says it's not, because of the puny little # 4 ground wire. It's too small for the reduced size of the breaker.

I am frustrated and stymied on what is the best approach. We just paid 5k to have the driveway fix so I am trying to avoid ripping that up.

I would appreciate opinions on this.
You are overthinking this. Downsizing the breaker does not create a hazard. Focus on correct conductor sizing, neutral addition, grounding method, and conduit fill. Consult code tables or a licensed electrician.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,048
Likes: 38
G
Member
The code says if you upsize the ungrounded conductors for "voltage drop" you need to upsize the grounding conductor but that is not what you are doing. Voltage drop is not an issue here and hopefully the AHJ will understand.


Greg Fretwell
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5