ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 456 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#214252 11/03/14 11:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
B
BigB Offline OP
Member
We have been using a lot of the Arlington Industries "One" box, which is listed for both old & new work. The 4 gang ones do not have a bracket for additional support like most 4 gang boxes do. Our inspector's here will fail for no additional support on 4 gang and up, but I cannot find a code reference. I believe multi gang boxes manufactured with additional brackets are required to be secured with those brackets but I do not believe a listed box manufactured with no additional bracket is required to be supported at both ends, and to do so would violate 314.23(1). I think they have been enforcing the manufacturer's requirement to use the provided additional supports for so long it has grown into "all four gangs to be supported" in their minds. Am I correct or did I miss something in the NEC? (We do not have any local amendments so it can't
be that)

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Workgear for Electricians

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
Contact Arlington -- customer service -- to see if they've got UL/CSA literature that backs your contention.

Your best shot at winning the AHJ over comes from authority.

This is especially true when the issue turns on a specific product.

A four-gang box is pretty uncommon in residential. With any kind of wiring discretion, my impulse is to design away from such a box.

Obviously, any support scheme is sure to compromise Arlington's depth adjustment scheme.



Tesla
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,049
Likes: 38
G
Member
I think the rub comes in the first line of 314.23(B)
"shall be rigidly and securely fastened in place."

If the far end is not secure and rigid, you need better bracing.



Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 9
Member
I just looked around the Arlington site, and see no info.

I have to go with Greg....far end moves, it needs bracing.



John
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
B
BigB Offline OP
Member
On there specifications page it says "super secure" and "no wobble". Since they are flat against the stud they do not move, and are rigid and secure. I would think this meets the requirements of 314.23(B). We emailed Arlington and are waiting for a reply. I guess I am having trouble understanding why a listed product cannot be installed per the instructions. It is still my belief that the inspectors have been seeing them with the extra brace for so long they assume that the extra brace is required.

[Linked Image from i39.photobucket.com]



Last edited by BigB; 11/04/14 11:25 PM.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 9
Member
I saw what you posted, but I don't see any reference to the 4 gang.

If you mount it and it's solid, I would have no issue.


John

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5