ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
How's all our Non-US folks doing?
by djk - 07/23/21 09:13 PM
Switched Receptacles -Top or Bottom?
by donles - 07/23/21 10:51 AM
Do You Travel?
by Bill Addiss - 07/20/21 04:26 PM
Backup Generator Done Right
by timmp - 07/18/21 12:20 PM
Square D "All-In-One" Panelboard
by Rachel - 07/16/21 04:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
OOPSIE!
OOPSIE!
by timmp, July 13
AT&T Office Thermostat, Summer
AT&T Office Thermostat, Summer
by timmp, July 13
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 9 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#210018 05/22/13 09:08 AM
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 830
S
Member
Sorry to keep bombarding with questions, but after a long "drought"(probably spelled that wrong), work has started to come again. I have a big industrial building that has a break room built in the middle of it. It used to be an office area.It has some romex already dropped down the walls from metal junction boxes on top. Is this code compliant. Seems like it would be alright, since it is not exposed to the rest of the building. It is framed up with bathrooms on the outside perimeter of it. Don't know exactly what they will be using the building for right now, it is just an empty space they are getting ready to move into. Thanks

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,275
Likes: 2
Member
334.10 of 2008 NEC:

334.10 Uses Permitted.
Type NM, Type NMC, and Type NMS cables shall be permitted to be used in the following:
(1) One- and two-family dwellings.
(2) Multifamily dwellings permitted to be of Types III, IV, and V construction except as prohibited in 334.12.
(3) Other structures permitted to be of Types III, IV, and V construction except as prohibited in 334.12. Cables shall be concealed within walls, floors, or ceilings that provide a thermal barrier of material that has at least a 15-minute finish rating as identified in listings of fire-rated assemblies.

There are FPNs and info on where to find the structure types within the text within the Handbook, and probably the Code book


John
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 830
S
Member
Thanks John.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,653
Likes: 2
G
Member
The real issue is construction type, "industrial" and "Commercial" are really meaningless in this decision.
I have seen industrial or commercial zoning in buildings that were clearly type III or even type V in some strip malls.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,275
Likes: 2
Member
Greg:
I know what you mean.

When I had my EC hat on, no NM (except occasional temps) was installed in any comm jobs that I did. BX, AC, MC, and we were extatic when the aluminum jacket MC was introduced.

Industrial was EMT, RGC, IMC.



John
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,653
Likes: 2
G
Member
Physical protection issues usually drive tougher wiring methods anyway but if this is in a wall romex can be OK if it is not Type I or II.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
John,


Up here they use RX in com. jobs all the time as long as the building isn't type I or II. Most EC's will use #12 ga wire, but I have seen #14 wire in there too.

Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Cat Servant
Member
Somebody was napping when they changed the rules - perhaps a decade ago.

Romex was developed for, and marketed to, the residential market. I witnessed many strident representations by NM manufacturers to UL (and the code committees) that NM was only intended for use in small, simple residential buildings with wood frames.

This is why, for decades, the NEC limited the use of NM to wood-framed residential buildings of three floors or less. Three floors is as tall as you can go with wood framing; taller buildings require different construction methods.

I can't recall exactly when the NEC was re-written (99? 02?), but the NEC eliminated the earlier language completely, and instead referred to the construction type. As the code is now written, you could wire the Sears Tower, the Pentagon, and the mall of America using Romex.

Putting this in context, this was also (coincidence?) the same time the AFCI came on the market. We've seen other restrictions placed on places where Romex is likely to be used; witness the restrictions placed on residential multi-wire circuits in the 2011 edition. Romex has also been effectively banned from crawl spaces since 2008 (damp locations).

Yet, there are still plenty of localities where the use of NM (as well as "Smurf tube") is banned from anything that's not a small home. Even PVC conduit is banned in many places, except for very specialized applications (Chicago comes to mind).

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,653
Likes: 2
G
Member
Quote
witness the restrictions placed on residential multi-wire circuits in the 2011 edition.


What was that change?


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 830
S
Member
What are the specifications for Type 1 and 2 walls. I can't seem to see a clear definition of it by searching the web.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,287
Joined: December 2000
Top Posters(30 Days)
Rachel 4
timmp 4
Popular Topics(Views)
281,394 Are you busy
215,036 Re: Forum
201,920 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5