ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 142 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#209941 05/16/13 02:42 PM
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 75
Member
Is there any code section requiring risers and the 90 from a duct bank to be schedule 80 PVC or Rigid Conduit? I think it comes down to physical damage but on the job we have a 13.8 duct bank of schedule 40 pvc that has pvc 90's and risers that I feel need to be and the SPECS call for galvanized rigid conduit..

any help on what NEC says would be appreciated...see pic attached.

Thank you,

Greg

Attached Images
underground.JPG

Don't drive and TEXT! Drive now TALK LATER!
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
300.5(D)(4) is what you are talking about.

Quote

(D) Protection from Damage. Direct-buried conductors and cables shall be protected from damage in accordance with 300.5(D)(1) through (D)(4).

(4) Enclosure or Raceway Damage. Where the enclosure or raceway is subject to physical damage, the conductors shall be installed in rigid metal conduit, intermediate metal conduit, Schedule 80 PVC conduit, or equivalent.


It still brings up that ambiguous "subject to physical damage" thing.



Greg Fretwell
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
The 'over 600 volts' (300-31 to 300-50) basically is what Greg said above.

That said, who wrote the 'Specs' you referenced above??

'Specs' should be followed, or a letter from the writer (assume an engineer) allowing a change should be obtained.



John
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 75
Member
Thank you Greg!

regards

Greg


Don't drive and TEXT! Drive now TALK LATER!
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I used to see a lot of RNC sweeps on these risers because pulling wires around those corners can actually cut into PVC.
Around the water, they can still rust out so it is going to be a compromise around here.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
We always Put RSC 90's As gfretwell said. for the same reason. Lots of times the nylon pull string or the pulling rope would pull thru the 90's. If the RSC 90 extends above ground it should be bonded. Utility companys as well as others use PVC u guard & sch. 80 up the pole.
Just my 2 cents worth


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5