ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 254 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#208420 01/17/13 11:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Does anyone out there have trouble with Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing (CSST) and bonding of it? Are the AHJ's enforcing it to be bonded?

harold endean #208422 01/18/13 12:17 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
Harold:
Yes, I am enforcing CSST bonding. There is official comments on this in the new issue of the Communicator, both DCA and the Board of Examiners. The Board will allow non-ECs to do the bond, as long as they do not enter a panel to do it. YES, there is a PERMIT required.

Another PITA.


John
harold endean #208424 01/18/13 12:43 AM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
My limited understanding is that this stuff is now a focus of litigation.

http://claims-management.theclm.org/home/article/over-1-million-for-csst-case

"It's used for both propane and natural gas piping, so anywhere that you would use gas in a residential or commercial setting, you'll likely find CSST used as well—it is the go-to product in the construction industry today. However, many contractors who install it are unaware of its associated dangers when exposed to the electrical energy from lightning. Presently, there are several studies taking place to determine whether bonding, which is similar to grounding, is an effective means of making CSST safe. In the field, we have seen bonded and non-bonded systems experience the same type of failure from this energy, so there is a legitimate question as to whether bonding is the answer."


Last edited by Tesla; 01/18/13 12:43 AM.

Tesla
harold endean #208426 01/18/13 11:40 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
OK, I am aware of the issues, and in my humble opinion, this subject is a PITA. But, until there are changes within the applicable codes I have no choice in this matter.

Talk on the street is that there will be a change forthcoming to eliminate the required bonding.



John
harold endean #208427 01/18/13 11:44 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,381
Likes: 7
Member
If anyone is interested, here is a link to the NJ Construction Code Communicator (DCA) referencing the CSST

It's in Vol 24, No.3.....

http://www.state.nj.us/dca/divisions/codes/publications/ccc.html

All previous issues are at this link also.


John
harold endean #208430 01/18/13 01:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
Whoa,, Nelly .... hold your horses! Did anyone read that first link, the one about the judgement?

The CSST was damaged by a lightning strite a HALF MILE away?

What about all the other places closer to the strike? Was there no CSST in them?

I figure that at a half-mile distance, that CSST ought not have been exposed to ANY transient voltage. Maybe I'm ignorant. I don't have any hard proof, but I'm pretty sure I've had lightning strike a lot closer than 1/2 mile from me many times. Yet we're supposed to accept that enough volts accumulated on the CSST to burn through the PVC wrapper and arc to a nearby duct, igniting the gas as it did.

Something's rotten in Denmark.

Maybe the trial lawyers will call this stuff C$$T. laugh

harold endean #208432 01/18/13 08:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
T
Member
Reno...

That particular publication is entirely oriented towards trial lawyers....

It's a wet thumb in the wind.

Wait until the lawsuits over rooftop solar arrays kick in.

You know that roofs are being damaged all over America.


Tesla
harold endean #208435 01/19/13 01:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 193
S
Member
We are required to bond all csst according to manu specs. #6 back to the service.

I priced one job where they had a hole in the pipe and were wanting to get it bonded. It was in a detached boiler room of an apartment building. The quote was about $1,000 to bring the proper size back to the MDP. The management called me 2 weeks later asking why it was so high, they had gotten some other prices for under $200.00. I told them they could not get it inspected because it would be wrong and this would need to be inspected. They stil have not had the work done.

Even if it is done the manu specs, I don't know if it matters. I think it is questionable whether it will be covered. Thus the trial lawers and endless litigation.

harold endean #208436 01/19/13 01:50 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 193
S
Member
correction:
Mininum #6 copper back to service

harold endean #208442 01/19/13 01:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
H
Member
Here comes another dilemma, now that anyone can "Bond" CSST pipe, the electrical AHJ goes out to inspect. He will run into a plumber who is "Certified" to install CSST pipe. However he bonds it the way the manufacture says to. However it doesn't meet the way the state design shows. So the AHJ fails the job and I am sure the plumber will argue this call.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5