ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Where is Everyone?
by gfretwell - 11/27/20 06:18 PM
Happy Thanksgiving
by gfretwell - 11/26/20 08:52 PM
Insulated Tools: A Waste of Money?
by HotLine1 - 11/26/20 12:28 PM
Ground fault remover :-)
by NORCAL - 11/26/20 08:13 AM
Work Gloves?
by sabrown - 11/25/20 01:54 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 14 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Sizing Power Cable #207389 10/24/12 03:10 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
In sizing a 200 amp 120/240V power cord and using NEC table 400.5 under the 75 degree E2 column it shows that 1/0 type "W" cable is sufficient for 207 amps. Since compliance with 110.14 (C) is based on Table 310.16 does that mean
the ampacities listed in 310.16 override the ampacities listed in table 440.5?

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207390 10/24/12 10:05 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,218
HotLine1 Offline
Member
In plain english....the temp rating of the termination points cannot be exceeded. If you have 75 deg. terminations, then 400.5 rules, IMHO.

A read of 110.14(C) in 2011 & 2008 will direct you to details regarding conductors over 100 amps (110.14 (C)(1)etc.


John
Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: HotLine1] #207393 10/24/12 01:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Thanks Hotline. The commentary at the bottom of 2008 NEC Handbook page 483 (step 3, Termination analysis) is still confusing for me because it verifies the compliance of the application example using Table 310.16.
In my example (120/240V 200 amp power cord) with no applicable derating factors and using the 75 degree column in Table 400.5, using table 310.16 for verification as the commentary suggests would not result in compliance for 1/0 conductors.

Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207400 10/24/12 08:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,218
HotLine1 Offline
Member
Following your path above, you are 100% correct that 1/0 Cu is insufficient via 310.16 for verification. I'll have to wait 'till tommorrow to read the Handbook comm., as both '08 & '11 are in my office, and I can't find the '11 Handbook on DVD.

BTW, I still stand on my previous comment.


John
Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207415 10/27/12 04:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
If you get a chance, please read the commentary after 110.14 (2)on pages 48 and 49 of the 200 NEC Handbook let me know how that affects your stance. Still trying to make 100% sense of this....Thank you.

Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207416 10/27/12 08:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
2008 Handbook.

Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207419 10/28/12 02:09 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,543
G
gfretwell Offline
Member
Did you see note 3 in 400.5(B)?
I think that puts you into the F column with a 120/240 cable (3 cc conductors)


Greg Fretwell
Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207421 10/28/12 02:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Hi Greg. I was going with note 2 in 400.5(B) since the neutral per 400.5(B)is not required to meet the requirements
of a CCC. Even the F column ampacities in table 400.5(B)( 2/0 = 208 amps)would not fly using table 310.16 for the termination requirements. The commentary after 110.14(2) pretty much says to not use tables other than 310.16 for termination verification which seems to mean that is does override table 400.5.

Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207425 10/29/12 12:57 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,543
G
gfretwell Offline
Member
There is an example that puts you in 3/0 in the handbook but it is talking about >30c.

I have to admit I have never been in this article and it is pretty confusing the way they word it. I am not 100% sure why you wouldn't have to just use 310.16.

It does sound like they are talking about a line cord for a listed piece of equipment and just giving the NRTL some wiggle room

400.5
Quote
...These tables shall be used in conjunction with applicable end-use product standards to ensure selection of the proper size and type...


Greg Fretwell
Re: Sizing Power Cable [Re: wewire2] #207426 10/29/12 02:17 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Cool! I was worried it was a no-brainer and I was missing the boat.
The quote from 400.5(A) you posted is also confusing because the wording "in conjunction" seems ambiguous. I'm guessing they mean the lowest rating between the NEC and NRTL shall prevail.


Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 9
Popular Topics(Views)
272,071 Are you busy
205,961 Re: Forum
194,010 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3