|
|
|
0 members (),
274
guests, and
42
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
OP
Member
|
There is a concern on an existing installation where the meter and outdoor load center are approximately 7 feet from the inside wall of an in ground pool. Looking thru 680 I see no violation, not even a requirement to include it in the equipotential bonding as it is not within 5 feet of the inside wall. Am I correct?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,029 Likes: 37
Member
|
I think you are right but look up. Where is the service drop?
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
OP
Member
|
I think you are right but look up. Where is the service drop? The service conductors are piped across the roof for 25 feet then there is a 90 up with a weatherhead. Adjacent to this weatherhead there is a service mast fastened to the building to support the overhead, keeping it 25' from the water. It is not pretty.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,029 Likes: 37
Member
|
It sounds legal tho... sometimes the law ain't pretty  Was any consideration given to raceways on a roof? (derating)
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 829
OP
Member
|
It sounds legal tho... sometimes the law ain't pretty Was any consideration given to raceways on a roof? (derating) I doubt it since my area just started enforcing derating for ambient last year, and this installation is at least 30 years old. This brings up something I have been wondering about, when de-rating residential service conductors would you start with the ampacities listed in table 310.15(B)(6)?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,029 Likes: 37
Member
|
That is why I was curious.
310.15(B)(2)(c) refers you to 310.16
I am not sure what you do with (B)(6) service feeders. I was wondering what size they ended up with.
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
