ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/22/24 10:36 AM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 227 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,930
Likes: 34
G
Member
The logic may be flawed but if they really want the grounded conductor opened, it sounds like that is not happening.

As a guy who spent most of my life chasing transients, a safer option would be to ground all of the conductors but that is not what the code says.


Greg Fretwell
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 12
R
Member
The requirement is somewhat archaic. As with a great deal of Article 514, Section 514.11(A) was originally extracted fom NFPA 30 or one of its successor documents. The current parallel text in NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages is no longer as stringent. (See Section 6.7)
The text does reflect the general anathema Articles 500 through 516 hold for multiwire branch circuits and not quite so obvious the fairly stringent bonding requirements in Classified locations. (They want absolutely no possible path for a potential ground fault) The text may be due for editing.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5