ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 262 guests, and 15 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
W
New Member
2 questions...

1. In MA, if you replace ungrounded receptacles with ungrounded receptacles as permited in the Code, are they required to be tamper proof.

2. If you add receptacles in an existing dwelling, are the new receptacles required to be tamper proof.

No guessing, I would like back-up info.

Tools for Electricians:

Tools for Electricians, Installers & Maintenance Technicians

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 9
Member
Wireman:

Welcome to ECN Forums. I'm sure one of our Mass. members will set you straight.



John
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
1] No, 406.3[D] says you can replace a non-grounding receptacle with another non-grounding receptacle. No on the TR also, since they don’t exist in a non-grounding receptacle, as far as I know anyway. There is also the option of using a GFCI receptacle in place of a non-grounding receptacle.

2] That would be a yes, since the added receptacles are new work, not existing. They would need to be TR and also don’t forget that if AFCI or GFCI protection would currently be required for that location, you need to address that as well.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5