ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Lock-down Thread
by JoeTestingEngr - 04/18/21 12:35 AM
Where is Everyone?
by gfretwell - 04/17/21 07:32 PM
Upside Down ThreeWay
by Trumpy - 04/17/21 06:25 AM
Thought this was funny
by Trumpy - 04/17/21 06:22 AM
How's all our Non-US folks doing?
by Trumpy - 04/17/21 05:37 AM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 24 guests, and 14 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
AFCI's #19450 12/28/02 04:38 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
R
rowdyrudy Offline OP
Member
In attempting to get as much info as possible for presentation to the full group for discussion, I have found some disturbing items. If anything has changed from the below I'd like to know.
1. AFCI's not compatible with GFCI protected circuits.
2. Combination AFCI/GFCI CB's may be available in the future.
3. No testing device available for AFCI CB's.
4. Disconnect all AFCI's prior to hy-potting a panel.
Several other concerns/shortcomings.
The other panel members are leaning towards rejecting the requirement for AFCI's, as have many jurisdictions. What is the concensus from those who are forced to deal with items like this that are injected into the system prior to having full testing and evaluation. The one that is most disturbing to me is #1. It appears that the mfgrs once again used their influence to get an item in the code before it's time. It makes it real difficult for those who are trying to get legislation passed to accept the NEC.
Rowdy

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: AFCI's #19451 12/28/02 05:27 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
I suggest that you do a search on this forum for AFCI. There are a large number of threads with extensive posts on this subject.
don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: AFCI's #19452 12/28/02 06:02 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
R
rowdyrudy Offline OP
Member
I have searched the mfgrs and UL sites. That's where I got the info.
Rowdy

Re: AFCI's #19453 12/28/02 07:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,389
S
sparky Offline
Member
2nd Don's reply

quickly:

1. AFCI's not compatible with GFCI protected circuits.

no prob, to my knowledge.....

2. Combination AFCI/GFCI CB's may be available in the future.

as i understand it, yes.....


3. No testing device available for AFCI CB's.

no,there was a thread here, and new 'tester'.

4. Disconnect all AFCI's prior to hy-potting a panel.

true, i believe it is stated on the packaging.

Re: AFCI's #19454 12/29/02 04:53 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
nesparky Offline
Member
Because of the lack of reliable accurate historical information and a lot of manufacturers hype, many jurisdictions declined to be part of the beta test of these devices.
as for your questions
# 1 no need to put a gfi and afci on same circuit.
#2 Cutler hammer and square D afci have gfi circuitry in thier afci. So thier rep's claim as does thier brocures. It set somewhere from 30 to 70 mA according to the rep's depending on manufacturer.
#3 true only device marketed is a waste of maney it has a problem according to a recall notice I saw
#4 Any device with sensitive electronics will not stand a hipot test including gfi breakers.
As don said AFCI's have been the subject of a lot of posts here. I for one still do not believe the are worth the cost.


ed
Re: AFCI's #19455 12/29/02 11:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
sparky66wv Offline
Member
Allow me to add:
The AFCIs, for the most part, are Class B GFCIs. They cannot be used as Class A GFCI protection.


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
Re: AFCI's #19456 12/29/02 01:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
We should not be calling the ground fault protection that is built into the AFCI breaker GFCI. It is not GFCI, with the exception of the dual listed CH product, it is GFP. As sparky66 pointed out, the GFP in the AFCI device is set to operate much above the required setpoint of a GFCI device. The term GFCI should be reserved for use for ground fault protection devices that are intended to protect people. The term GFP should be used for all other ground fault protection devices. When you get down to studying the details of the AFCI breaker operation, you will find that in many cases the actual protection is provided by the GFP circuit and not the fancy arc detection circuit.
don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: AFCI's #19457 12/29/02 03:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
E
ElectricAL Offline
Member
NESparky,

I can think of at least one scenario that leads to a required GFI on an AFCI protected circuit.

If I elect to put an exterior outlet on the deck (hypothetical deck) outside the bedroom, when the deck access is through the bedroom, I'll find it awful tempting to tag on the deck outlet and light to the bedroom circuit, especially if the job is competitively bid.

Admittedly, not all deck situations will require a GFI for the outlet on the deck, but many will.

Exploring the possibilities,

Al


Al Hildenbrand
Re: AFCI's #19458 12/30/02 02:47 AM
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
N
nesparky Offline
Member
Good point AL
Since my home state deleted the AFCI requirements when the 2002 code was adopted, I do not have to worry about that problem.


ed

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
MarkC10
MarkC10
CA, Inland Empire
Posts: 43
Joined: September 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 11
Popular Topics(Views)
277,733 Are you busy
211,312 Re: Forum
198,347 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3