ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
GFCI's pops in large numbers
by dsk - 10/21/21 02:03 AM
Need some info on Japanese outlets, 200V 15A
by andey - 10/20/21 08:05 AM
Wire sizing
by watersparkfalls - 10/19/21 07:27 AM
nec 110.3 (B)
by watersparkfalls - 10/19/21 07:09 AM
A 5-20(20a) receptacle is legal on a 15a circuit?
by libellis - 10/10/21 12:46 PM
New in the Gallery:
240/208 to a house
240/208 to a house
by wa2ise, October 9
Now you know.
Now you know.
by Tom_Horne, September 7
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 9 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#191199 12/21/09 11:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 459
J
Jim M Offline OP
Member
Wonder if this is the official cause or just the reporters take on the cause? How about improper storage of combustibles too close to a heating source?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34484381/ns/local_news-baltimore_md/


Jim M #191200 12/21/09 11:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Cat Servant
Member
The headline conflicts with the story. Maybe the editor ought to read his own paper.

Stuff gets stacked on the stove ... then catches fire when the stove is turned on? Who could have anticipated that ever happening?

renosteinke #191201 12/21/09 12:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 402
J
Member
Yea but the circuit was turned on. That was the cause. No fault to the operator or the person who stored the junk. It's the breaker's fault. It should have known better than to let itself be turned on.

jdevlin #191203 12/21/09 02:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
E
Member
Just like when someone plugs an electric heater into an 18/2 extension cord, causing an "electrical" fire. No, it was caused by carelessness, not electricity.

In this case, I'd agree that the reporter's take was way off.


---Ed---

"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
EV607797 #191205 12/21/09 03:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,667
Likes: 6
G
Member
The people who write headlines seem to never actually read the story.
I also question a lot of these "electrical" fire reports.
You know this one was reported as electrical, not stupidity. That skews the statistics and allows groups like NFPA to justify dumb stuff like the AFCI requirement.


Greg Fretwell
gfretwell #191217 12/21/09 10:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,282
Likes: 3
Member
$ 3.5 mil in damages added into the running totals of 'electrical fires'. I question the fire reports that I see that are 'electrical', of which 99 to 100% are 'stupidity' that no AFCI/GFCI/TR/WR would prevent. Next code cycle, perhaps we may have a mandated "SFCI".

(Stupidity Fault Current Interupter)


John
HotLine1 #191222 12/21/09 10:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 165
Member
I wonder if any SFCI's will come back to the QA lab painted over, packed with plaster, showing signs of being hammered into the box, with a note attached, "Doesn't work"?

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 16
T
Member
Along this same line I remember an editorial in EC&M back in the 70's complaining about poor fire cause attribution. It cited a report where the fire investigator said that the source of the fire could not be determined since the building did not have electrical service.

Tinkerer #191408 12/27/09 11:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Cat Servant
Member
Tinkerer, I was on scene the morning after a fatal fire in a hotel room. My job was to 'make safe' the electrical.

This fire had been so intense that the couplings had melted off the EMT. Still, the point of origen was fairly clear; there was little left of the bed but the metal parts of the box springs. Chalk one up to smoking in bed.

This all aside, the adjuster from the insurance company was just determined to attribute the fire to 'electrical.' This was despite the scene having already been dissected by the crime-scene folks (there had also been some indication there might have been foul play).

renosteinke #191412 12/27/09 01:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,667
Likes: 6
G
Member
I am another one who thinks "electrical" is a quick way out without actually finding the cause of a fire. Unless they can actually tell me some story that makes sense they are just throwing a wild guess out there that nobody will dispute. The more fires that get attributed to some nebulous "electrical" cause, the more plausible it becomes.
The down side of that laziness is how easy it was to justify things like the AFCI requirement.


Greg Fretwell
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Potseal
Potseal
Saskatchewan
Posts: 264
Joined: February 2013
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 6
Popular Topics(Views)
284,728 Are you busy
217,352 Re: Forum
203,702 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5