ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Bill Addiss. 08/13/18 05:52 PM
Upgrade the old panel
by gfretwell. 08/13/18 12:20 AM
depth of duckbank
by ghost307. 08/12/18 09:26 PM
Section 179 vehicle purchases
by BigB. 08/05/18 01:06 PM
Don't you buy this stuff
by BigB. 08/05/18 01:00 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 8 guests, and 17 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Is this transformer calculation correct? #187389
06/25/09 04:54 PM
06/25/09 04:54 PM
bigpapa  Offline OP
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81
600v 3 phase to 120/208v 150kva dry type isolation transformer.
For some reason I need to be reminded of certain things that I have
forgotten over the years. Maybe someone can refresh me on this
transformer calculation.
Transformer is dry 150kva 3ph 600 to 120/208v isolation type.

Rated primary current is 144.5A
Primary breaker chosen is 150A therefore secondary current is 150x turns ratio of
2.88 which is 432A
Secondary conductors are 125% of RATED secondary current and
not actual secondary current which would be 416.6 x 1.25 = 520.8A.

I am thinking that secondary conductors are not calculated on the basis of actual secondary current but the transformers rated current.
Am I correct or have I missed something here?

Tools for Electricians:
Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa] #187395
06/25/09 08:52 PM
06/25/09 08:52 PM
Yoopersup  Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 845
This is a 480 volt 3 phase to 120/208 volt 3 phase right??
Also this is a feeder right???
1.73 x 480 = 830.4
150 x 1000 = 150000
150000 divided 830.4 = 180.63 amps primary
1.73 x 208 = 359.84
150000 divided by 359.84 = 416.85

then go to table 450.3(B)

That 600volts on Primary I think might be more like 480 volts.

Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: Yoopersup] #187398
06/25/09 09:32 PM
06/25/09 09:32 PM
bigpapa  Offline OP
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 81

Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa] #187401
06/25/09 11:29 PM
06/25/09 11:29 PM
twh  Offline
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 947
Regina, Sask.
Rule 26-258: 125% of rated secondary current
150,000 / 208 / 1.732 x 1.25

primary conductors are also 125% in the same rule. It's the same calculation except 600 volts is substituted for 208 volts.

The same rule allows you to reduce the size to the demand providing... etc.

Overcurrent rules are in 26-256. Watch the ampacity of panels and splitters fed from transformers. They also must be rated for 125%.

For our Southern friends, 600/347 volts is common in Canada.

Re: Is this transformer calculation correct? [Re: bigpapa] #187403
06/26/09 01:30 AM
06/26/09 01:30 AM
jay8  Offline
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 183
Vancouver, BC
Lets not turn this into some American bashing thing, his calculations are correct for secondary current. Maybe you forgot to use those little icons above each post.


2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman


Member Spotlight
Kansas City, KS
Posts: 30
Joined: January 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
248,573 Are you busy
186,303 Re: Forum
175,759 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.025s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9685 MB (Peak: 1.1086 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-08-17 13:07:05 UTC