ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Electric Cow Catcher?
Electric Cow Catcher?

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 76 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
I am interested in comments on a fix. Sometimes we run into conductors in a ceiling box that have been damaged by overheating due to over wattage of the incandescent lamps. To restore them, is it permitted per Section 300.14 NEC to cut them back to good insulation and splice a six inch tail? If not, what can be done?


Earl
Horizontal Ad
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 764
K
Member
I always first try and pull some slack through the clamp or connector if possible. If not, I will do exactly as you described.
In older homes where 60C NM cable is present, I always connect pigtails of 90C NM-B wire to comply with the light fixture listing that they be connected to min 90C wiring.
As far as 300.14 goes, it could probably be argued that there doesn't seem to be any wording that indicates that the required free conductor has to be one continuous piece and since this pigtail conductor doesn't originate from outside the box through a separate KO entry, it doesn't count as any additional box fill according to 314,16[B],1.
So, IMO these pigtailed wires would be considered a single conductor and the wirenuts also wouldn’t need to be counted in box fill either.
Seems like a win, win situation for once.



Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
Would it be better to use spaghetti tubing (or heat shrink, whichever listed for the purpose) to slip over the damaged portion of the insulation on the existing conductor? (remove the crumbled or scotched insulation, and use the spaghetti tubing as new insulation, and overlap the tubing over existing good insulation). That way, there's no splice in the copper itself. You could use spaghetti that has a higher temperature rating.

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
I have used both of these fixes and butt splices as well.

It sure beats having to cut in new boxes and "invisoplates".

Glad I'm not the only one.


Earl
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 169
C
Member
Went out to fix "a few lights not working" last week.
Without wasting too much time I decided to take down the entry fixture. 6 old asphalt cables in a 3/0 metal with a hickey and nice and crispy. Oh boy! Two j-boxes in the attic later everything was working.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,001
Likes: 35
G
Member
For a short while, right after AMP started marketing the enclosed NM splice/tap some were suggesting this could be used and buried in these situations.
Knock out the old box, put in a splice up past the box and reinstall an old work ceiling box. Fortunately that didn't last long. The code 334.40(B) didn't change, only the marketing and literature that comes with the device. Now they only suggest this can be used in modular homes.
It is a distinction without a difference to me. Fires don't know the difference between stick built and factory built IMHO.
That still leaves us with few good options if you have no access to the top of the box.


Greg Fretwell

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
333,350 Are you busy
258,687 Re: Forum
240,122 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5