ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by HotLine1. 06/13/18 01:50 PM
GE Lighting Recalls LED Tube Lamps
by Admin. 06/12/18 09:32 PM
Ketra Recalls Recessed Downlights
by Admin. 06/12/18 09:17 PM
diazed fuses
by Texas_Ranger. 06/11/18 07:31 AM
soda can fuse from UK, facebook
by wa2ise. 06/06/18 11:02 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 41 guests, and 24 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Xfmr XO bond location preference #177250
04/26/08 04:31 PM
04/26/08 04:31 PM
R
Redsy  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
I would prefer to bond the XO terminal in the transformer (120/208)housing. Doing so, I would need to float the neutral in the panelboard, but I know that semi-qualified staff will use this panel and they always seem to assume that neutral and ground busses are the equivalent.

Is there a disadvantage to bond the neutral in the panel instead?
The secondary raceway is about 3' of 2" greenfield.

Please discuss any pros & cons (if any).

Thanks

John (Redsy)

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177257
04/26/08 09:19 PM
04/26/08 09:19 PM
W
WireNuts29  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 85
Mass, U.S.A.
John,
It would seem to me, if somehow, these semi- qualified individuals were to somehow add a second panel. Either add double lugs at the transformer or a feed through from your setup, they would be relying completely on that bond in the original panel to create the neutral. It is in my opinion the most practical, and safest method to bond your XO at the transformer. Suppose you do you bond at the first panel, and one of these qualified people remove the bonding jumper, because it should be bonded at the transformer. you may be opening up a can of worms.

Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177260
04/27/08 08:36 AM
04/27/08 08:36 AM
R
Redsy  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Thanks Nuts!
I know the facility and their people. They would not add a subpanel, but they will add branch circuits. And they will indiscriminately tie ground and neutral to either buss. I see it everywhere.

I know that the bonding can be done at either location as far as NEC goes, but other than my concern about the staff, I'm wondering what others prefer, and why.

Thanks,

John


Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177262
04/27/08 09:50 AM
04/27/08 09:50 AM
electure  Offline

Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,268
Fullerton, CA USA
I much prefer bonding XO in the transformer.

Could you possibly label the busses in respect to their usages? That might get the ball rolling for their education, too.

Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177264
04/27/08 03:18 PM
04/27/08 03:18 PM
R
Redsy  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Thanks guys.

Is there any(technical,or functional)reason you prefer bonding in the Xfmr?

Other than the cost to run additional ground wire to the panel,(which in this case is only about 6' of wire) is there any reason to choose bonding in the panel?

Just trying to get different opinions.

Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177287
04/28/08 07:21 AM
04/28/08 07:21 AM
S
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Chesapeake, VA
It's generally best to ground the neutral as close to the source as possible, as this provides the most efficient path to ground. This will also keep voltage drop between the grounding point and X0 terminal as low as possible, which will keep the 3 phases better centered around ground. In practice, it's only going to make a few volts worth of difference, especially if you're only talking about 6', but it's still more efficient to bond at the transformer.

I would recommend bonding at the transfomer.

Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: SteveFehr] #177292
04/28/08 10:00 AM
04/28/08 10:00 AM
S
sparkyinak  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,334
Alaska
Just of curiousity, why woundn't you bond at the tranny?


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177308
04/28/08 09:50 PM
04/28/08 09:50 PM
R
Redsy  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
sparkyinak,

The particulat inspector on this job implied that it should be bonded at both places, which I believe to be a misunderstanding of the NEC.

I was thinking about bonding in the panel because he would be more likely to look there, as opposed in the transformer housing. (I know this approach may seem questionable, but I was just putting out feelers)


Last edited by Redsy; 04/28/08 09:51 PM.
Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177312
04/28/08 10:13 PM
04/28/08 10:13 PM
T
twh  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 945
Regina, Sask.
Bonding in two places is evil. It puts the neutral wire in parallel with the ground wire.

Re: Xfmr XO bond location preference [Re: Redsy] #177317
04/28/08 10:31 PM
04/28/08 10:31 PM
S
sparkyinak  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,334
Alaska
A double bond is double trouble. I'm carious the inspector woud implied that.


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Vlado
Vlado
Croatia
Posts: 28
Joined: February 2011
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 5
Popular Topics(Views)
247,584 Are you busy
184,916 Re: Forum
174,139 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.038s Queries: 16 (0.006s) Memory: 1.0267 MB (Peak: 1.2102 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-06-19 16:13:23 UTC