|
0 members (),
75
guests, and
13
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
OP
New Member
|
Can anyone shed any light on 250.122(B)? Thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Sure, what do you want to know?
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,796 Likes: 15
Member
|
Short answer. If you upsize the conductors for something like voltage drop you also have to upsize the EGC.
Greg Fretwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
Member
|
They want to you increase the EGC by the same ratio you increase the current conductors. These #s are availible in Table 8
For example, lets say you have a 125A circuit (Normally #2 Cu w/#8 EGC) but have to increase the conductors to 1/0 to allow for derating:
#2 = 66kcmil 1/0 = 106kcmil Increase is 60%.
#8 = 16.5kcmil. 16.5kcmil * 160% = 26.4kcmil
Looking through the table, #6 = 26.2kcmil, and would be the proper ground wire to use.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
The interesting part is where you have a circuit protected at 30 amps or less....the EGC must be the same size as the circuit conductors. This often comes into play for parking lot lighting where you may be using a #4 or 6 on a 20 amp circuit. Don
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
New Member
|
This is like many parts of the NEC which has been around from the early nightteen 30s when large pipe organ was popular
Now we have keyboardsand large amp systems or sound systems which make some of the old way of doing things of date , remember knob and tube, worked well in its day
Just food for thought thank you
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 139
Member
|
The conflict described by Don also occurs on equipment such as motors and air conditioning equipment that may have conductors that are permitted to be sized smaller than the branch circuit overcurrent device.
In many cases, the contractor will install conductors sized based on the max overcurrent device instead of the minimum branch circuit size and NOT increase the EGC in proportion.
The contractor doesn't understand why the EGC has to be increase when a smaller EGC is normally permitted for that circuit rating.
There were a couple proposals submitted this past code cycle that tried to clear up this issue, but none were accepted.
I have tried to come up with a good rewrite of 250.122(B) myself without much luck.
Bryan P. Holland, ECO. Secretary - IAEI Florida Chapter
|
|
|
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
|
|
|
|
|