ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (gfretwell), 32 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#17318 11/24/02 01:12 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Trumpy Offline OP
Member
With a recent factory upgrade, I had the
un-enviable task of throwing the Main Isolator, back into service, and got the handle stuck half way, I heard and saw welding of the contacts inside the Isolator
(1000A@400V).
How would you go about opening or closing a
High current Isolator, have I got it all wrong?.

[This message has been edited by Trumpy (edited 11-26-2002).]

#17319 11/24/02 12:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
G
Member
What I have allways done is;

Remove as much load as possible.

When you go to throw the switch, commit to the action and close it fast and hard.

If you have a chance to examine the switch de-energised always take the opportunity to do it. Often these switches haven't been moved in years and then we expect them to operate like new. A little lubrication helps a bunch.

GJ

GJ

#17320 11/25/02 12:40 AM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
An "ACB" is mentioned, and on the North-American continent, there are 3 types of breaker construction in that range—air-{frame}, insulated-case and molded-case. In my experience, air-frame breakers are generally "rackable," meaning they can be mechanically exercised/checked to operate in a test position—unenergized.

After the fact, I would want to determine if the fault duty was too high, and if the breaker manufacturer provided any maintenance instructions. Sounds like you were able to sidestep a potentially serious accident. Because of the breaker misoperation, it integral ground-fault protection may have been useless.

In the US, NFPA 70E {Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces} calls for evaluation of arc-blast hazards, and appropriate personal protective equipment.

#17321 11/26/02 01:15 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,443
Likes: 3
Trumpy Offline OP
Member
Sorry, the part that said ACB, should have read Isolator, this is now amended.
Have since locked off the supply and cleaned the contacts and lubed the operating mechanism, works like a charm, now.
But this was an old metal-clad unit(the norm
in Industrial installations, over here). [Linked Image]

#17322 11/26/02 06:37 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
In the US, NEMA {nema.org} has somewhat applicable standards that are on line—ICS2.3-1995 Annex A ‘Maintenance of Motor Controllers After a Fault Condition.’

These are basically common sense, but seem worth reviewing. Handy for establishing that endless “paper trail.”


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5