ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Lock-down Thread
by Bill Addiss - 02/26/21 08:40 PM
Northern Tool Recalls Powerhorse Generators
by Admin - 02/25/21 09:49 PM
You will never guess
by gfretwell - 02/25/21 07:48 PM
New tool
by SMOKEYBOB - 02/15/21 04:59 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 15 guests, and 17 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Raintight EMT Fittings #171540 11/30/07 02:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
The newer designed raintight fittings are more expensive than the ones used in the past which are now only rated concrete tight. In the interest of efficiency,
should these also be required by local inspectors when used for low voltage or Telco runs?

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: wewire2] #171545 11/30/07 03:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,335
S
sparkyinak Offline
Member
Yes, 800.110


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: sparkyinak] #171554 11/30/07 07:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Ok so if the jurisdiction has only adopted the 2002 NEC and the 2004 CEC(California Electric Code) then technically it would not be required to use these?

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: wewire2] #171557 11/30/07 07:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 853
L
leland Offline
Member
Operate under the code/s in effect.

And how can a State like California be so behind? Don't they want to ban Fireplaces,correct "OZONE" and ahead of the curve on pollution? Massachusetts just wants to keep up with them.

I don't get it.

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: leland] #171559 11/30/07 07:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
The issue of 'raintight' connectors is not directly tied to any particular edition of the NEC. You need to use materials appropriate to the use.

The saga of the common compression fitting became a 'front burner' item the day some anonymous sort at UL actually tested some fittings to the 'wet location' test ... and they failed.

OOPS. The fittings everyone assumed were weather tight were not. UL revised the listing, and manufacturers scrambled to make a fitting that would pass the test. Some went a step further, and made some sort of indicator visible, for the convenience of the inspector.

So ... without regard for the code cycle your town uses, the old compression fittings are no longer considered suitable for use in wet locations; you need the new ones.

Since the code is not retro-active, there is no requirement to replace ones installed while they were still listed for the application.

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: renosteinke] #171561 11/30/07 07:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 853
L
leland Offline
Member
there is no requirement to replace ones installed while they were still listed for the application.---

Would you not have to bring the portion retrofitted into compliance?

08' as I understand makes ALL outside apps. "wet locations".

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: leland] #171565 11/30/07 08:21 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Correct .. what you work on today generally needs to meet today's rules. In this instance of fittings, I cannot see the 'maintenance' principles applying; it's not like you'ld have to pull a new wire!

Though, I must confess to being something of a hypocrite as to these newer fittings. They've been out for over five years - and I have yet to see one, let alone install one. Bridgeport, T&B, etal., seem quite happy to continue making the older style, and I'm not even sure the local parts houses have the newer ones on the shelf. Nor does it seem that the AHJ's are looking for them; that Reno is in the "desert" may be 'why.'

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: leland] #171567 11/30/07 08:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
We work all over Ca. Many supply houses haven't stocked the
Raintight fittings until recently. We finally found a jurisdiction that is requiring them and are now eating the cost difference. It seems crazy that you have to use rainproof fittings on a sleeve or a conduit that ends with an open end like at a ground rod. I also envision conduits prematurely rotting from the inside in certain instances. But then again maybe I'm biased because I'm losing a chunk of change.

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: wewire2] #171568 11/30/07 08:36 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 853
L
leland Offline
Member
eating the cost difference--

Why, Job start after the code change? or you not counting on the AHJ enforcing?
Code change makes price change.
There was a while here the bids were T&M due to copper prices fluctuating so rapidly.

Re: Raintight EMT Fittings [Re: leland] #171572 11/30/07 10:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 244
W
wewire2 Offline OP
Member
Hi Leland
It's really simple. I did not count on them enforcing it. The AHJ do not enforce it until they adopt it. When I am competing against other contractors, I don't add unnecessary costs to the job. It
reduces my chance of landing the job. In this case, I
did not do my homework and failed to investigate the
jurisdiction requirements. Code change might make the price change, but not instantly.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
NickD
NickD
Amish Country, PA
Posts: 46
Joined: March 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
275,414 Are you busy
209,306 Re: Forum
196,596 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3